Merged: Who would you give up for Paul George?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Rastapopoulos, Apr 25, 2017.

  1. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,771
    Likes Received:
    55,409
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Won't it be funny if it's CJ that gets traded FOR Paul George? :lol:
     
    Nikolokolus likes this.
  2. Sarni

    Sarni Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2016
    Messages:
    3,324
    Likes Received:
    2,782
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Kraków, Poland
    Well, we can't have him without offering CJ though. Even if it's a one-year rental, Indiana would probably rather have him for that year than trade him for bad contracts (which is everybody on our team bar Lillard, CJ, Nurkic, Vonleh and maybe Harkless) or mid and late first round picks.
     
    Minstrel, BBert and BonesJones like this.
  3. Voodoo

    Voodoo An American hero

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,874
    Likes Received:
    2,732
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Project Manager
    Location:
    Beaverton
    This.
     
    BigGameDamian likes this.
  4. chzbrgr

    chzbrgr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2015
    Messages:
    1,093
    Likes Received:
    1,101
    Trophy Points:
    113
    shoot give them all three this year and our 2019 and take back any horrible contract they want.

    AC hark Bazz vonleh +4 firsts? still probably taking 80 cents on the dollar from indiana's stand point
     
  5. BigGameDamian

    BigGameDamian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    32,306
    Likes Received:
    12,727
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Anyone that takes George in a trade probably will have to take Jefferson or Ellis back as well.
     
  6. Rhal

    Rhal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    12,997
    Likes Received:
    2,756
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    Portland
    George has pretty much made it clear he doesn't want to be there long term and him and his agent have made it clear his preference is LA. Doesn't mean we can't trade for him, I think we have the assets to do it since he wants out.
     
  7. Sarni

    Sarni Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2016
    Messages:
    3,324
    Likes Received:
    2,782
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Kraków, Poland
    Neither team should want to do that, I would say us even more so. Four first round picks is a lot to give for a player who will likely only spend a year with you (and even with him you are still not likely to win championship). And who is playing rotation for us? That move leaves us with Aminu, Turner and Davis and zero picks this year. That's very thin.
     
    UKRAINEFAN and BonesJones like this.
  8. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    67,845
    Likes Received:
    66,602
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A lot of time it's coaching plus roster that can interest a guy who's stuck on a middle level team. I can see PG loving it in Portland...Stotts is a players coach and he'll get George a lot of shots
     
  9. HolyBackboard

    HolyBackboard 2 Hot 2 Stop It

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2015
    Messages:
    718
    Likes Received:
    1,589
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Rip City
    Neil is not trading Dame or CJ. If it wasn't clear before Tuesday's press conference, it is now!

    If we get PG13, Melo, or whoever, they will be coming here to play with Dame, CJ, and Nurk.
     
  10. chzbrgr

    chzbrgr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2015
    Messages:
    1,093
    Likes Received:
    1,101
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Im just trying to make a package that's realistic even if it leaves you with a bunch of patty c minutes you have to do it from the blazers stand point. if adding paul george for spare parts and picks doesnt make us a top 3 team in the west then nothing will. Then if that's the case dame or cj has to go for like jimmy butler cause youre essentially saying there is no way with those two on the roster. You have to make the bet that winning will make PG stay. Waiting three more years on some first rounders just isnt realistic given our time frame.

    dame/FA
    cj/patty
    george/turner
    aminu/davis
    nurk

    I'd give that team a 40% chance to beat the warriors in a 7 game series which is about the odds id give SA or CLE
     
  11. Sarni

    Sarni Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2016
    Messages:
    3,324
    Likes Received:
    2,782
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Kraków, Poland
    I feel second unit would get destroyed. Actually our time frame is more convenient for waiting 2-3 more years. I don't see how Warriors will keep this team together in 3 years, CJ and Lillard will still be before 30 , Nurkic and Vonleh will be in their prime or just get significantly better. This roster is not built to win now and one trade, even for George or Butler, will not change that because of how tough it is to beat current top teams.
     
    BlazerCaravan likes this.
  12. PDXFonz

    PDXFonz I’m listening

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    19,493
    Likes Received:
    16,092
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree with what you said, but with the main complaint being about our role players if you haven't won with the within 2-3 years then you look at swapping them out anyways. Therefor I feel like if you can get George for a package of picks and players like aminu/Crabbe/harkless then it is worth a shot as you are basically take your eggs out of their baskets and putting them in the PG basket.
     
  13. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,536
    Likes Received:
    38,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Only trade for PG13 if you're getting rid of bad contracts.

    If they want all 3 picks, Turner, Meyers, and Crabbe for PG, then yes, because you can create more cap space to sign someone decent. However, Indy won't do that.
     
  14. PHXBlazer1

    PHXBlazer1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    7,090
    Likes Received:
    4,566
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Eugene
    CJ knows that it would be pointless for us to trade for Paul George if he is included in the deal. It would have to be for Vonleh and picks and anyone else they want not named Dame/Nurk
     
    dviss1 likes this.
  15. Blazer4ever

    Blazer4ever Finding a Way BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,920
    Likes Received:
    726
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Agricolture
    Location:
    Israel
    I think PG is unrealistic if we have to trade for him, can't see him coming as a FA either (and don't think we'd have the money).
    With that said, there are other options to pursue that are more realistic. I would probably get criticised for saying this but I wouldn't mind rolling the dice on Carmelo Anthony.
    With all his faults (he isn't much of a defender which isn't ideal next to Dame and CJ and his time in NY certainly raises questions about his desire and motivation but this is what could make him available) I think if he accepts a trade he could maybe find a renewed interest in actually winning some games and to not be remembered as a complete waste of talent.
    I can't guarantee that being traded to Portland would rejuvenate his career but I think it could happen. It's certainly a gamble cause Melo could also infect the other players with his apathy but if he can be the player he was in Denver, with Dame, CJ, Nurkic alongside him, it can payoff big time
     
  16. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    OK, guys, let's think about this a bit.

    If PG comes here he's playing the 3, just about exclusively. Dame and Nurk aren't going anywhere, b/c there's almost literally no way you can replace those 2 on the roster with our available assets, even if you wanted to. So that leaves the other wings (CJ, Turner, Crabbe) as the obvious building blocks of the trade. You can't have 4 wings making over 18M apiece. And, as stated above, you still haven't accounted for Aminu and Mo, who are 3's who can play smallball 4. That's almost 100M in just your 6 wing players. (more to the point, that's 80M for the other 58mpg at the wings that PG isn't going to play, plus whatever smallball 4 you can pull off)

    But let's just say that you picked one of those 3 as your building block and needed to add "goodies". Let's just say that IND accepts Vonleh as a goodie. Now we're back where we're counting on Davis/Hark/Aminu to play the 4 for 48mpg. And you still don't have a backup for Nurk outside of Leonard. But since you probably traded some serious draft capital for PG, you don't have cheap guys to develop.

    The way the roster is currently constructed requires a couple of things to make a serious leap. 1) clearing up the expensive SG logjam. In order I'd probably send away Turner, then Crabbe, then CJ. But I'm pretty sure their values to other teams are opposite of that. 2) adding in "pipeline" talent. You can pay stars if you have useful 5-10 roster spots on cheap contracts. Since vet mins generally don't come here, that leaves draft picks and young Undrafted Free Agents. 3) Health (duh.) 4) More defensive-skilled players. Whoever brought up the part about bringing in guys with long arms, short necks, intuitive rebounders, etc was close to the mark. Similarly to how some baseball analytics gurus have started pegging metadata like spin rate for targeting undervalued talent, grabbing guys with physical tangibles that help out their innate defensive mindset would be useful pieces to plug in around Dame and Nurk. 6) An increased level of accountability and attitude adjustment.

    There will likely be a part 2 to this, but I gotta do some work first.
     
    Nikolokolus and blue9 like this.
  17. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you would be betting the farm not on 2007 Melo, but the 2012 Olympic Melo. And I don't know that a) that Melo still exists and b) Dame , Nurk and Cj (if still around) will make him think he's playing with LBJ, Wade and Boogie.
     
  18. Sarni

    Sarni Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2016
    Messages:
    3,324
    Likes Received:
    2,782
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Kraków, Poland
    If Lakers get their pick this year it means they lose the one in 2018 and have zero reason to tank next season. They could try to get George for a package including one of Ingram, Russell or Randle plus a future first rounder (would have to be 2020 though which is not really valuable). Then again Lakers would actually be able to re-sign him.
     
  19. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,536
    Likes Received:
    38,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    So the options this board wants is to pursue is an old washed up Carmelo and a dude who will surely leave us after a year? Oh brother.
     
    BBert likes this.
  20. Blazer4ever

    Blazer4ever Finding a Way BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,920
    Likes Received:
    726
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Agricolture
    Location:
    Israel
    I think a change of scenery could do him good. I thought of typing "would" and changed it to "could" so it is as I said, a gamble.
    I think there's no doubt his time with the Knicks is/was a big disappointment but I think it is possible that with another team in another city he could regain at least some of his fire and respectability
     

Share This Page