Politics Mueller Report Filed

calling someone prejudiced is pretty directly about that person....that's how anyone speaking English would take it. My opinion concerning your use of prejudice as a talking point....it's a recurring theme for you that seems to achieve OT arguments galore..move on

 

I feel bad for these fuckers.

It is like they've thought every day was Friday for two full years and every time they find out it was Thursday and they still have to work tomorrow.

I remember that one time Buzzfeed screwed them over. I felt terrible about it.

 

Ok, I accept the rebuke.
However, it was your words that provoked the comment. I can't recall having you and prejudiced in the same thought before the post.

 

Pelosi is making the call to not start impeachment processes this late in his presidential term...I've covered this...if you ask questions...expect answers...if you don't agree ...state why. I've said my piece about all this and there's no new info to speculate about.

 

So do I, big time.
I can feel @riverman hurting, I hope he recovers.
I hope many do, as well as learn even a little bit.

 

So you have no opinion about Barfo's question about the timing of Mueller ending his investigation?

 

You took a screen shot of my reply to his thread...why don't you just try posting your own content for a change instead of pissing in the wind
I don't know ...maybe you just don't have anything to add. Have the conversation or sit around copying other people's ...choices

 

All this really means I guess is that Trump is really a good person after all

 

Doubtful.
But it likely means, there was indeed an ill conceived plan to derail a duly elected President.
Hang on! More to come.

 

Why? I thought Trump was completely exonerated

 

Perhaps one of our legal team members can enlighten us about or even correct the perception.
@Stevenson

Since Barr made it quite clear, under the Russian Interference section, that there was no conspiracy by Trump or his team, why then is the next question punted?

That is specifically, on the question of obstruction of justice? To me there never was a question here as the President, as the only Chief Executive in our system of Government, can at anytime fire any other member of the executive branch as part of his duties and prerogatives. They serve at his pleasure while he serves as per the will of the people.

But, Barr still left the question open somewhat, which seems entirely ridiculous to me, since he previously shut the door on there being any crime committed to warrant investigation. Without a crime, how would it be possible to obstruct justice or an investigation of an absent crime?

It seems conclusions are call for from people at his level of authority. The 42% need it.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/24/us/politics/barr-letter-mueller-report.html

 

They can continue to their destruction with their issues with Trump.

The bigger question is, who authorized Comey to investigate Trump the Presidential Candidate?
This level of corruption has never been attempted before in the history of our Republic.

It seems Loretta Lynch and Barrack Obama would have both have needed to sign off on the beginning of this investigation that began about the same time they decided not to pursue Hillary Clinton.

What sort of evidence of a crime by Trump do you suppose they were presented with to persuade them in jumping off the edge into history unknown?

Will someone bring their butt to fire for this folly?
I think it is overdue.

 

Perhaps Lidsey Graham's committee can begin to unravel that ball of crap that started this whole mess.

Whoo! The 42% has a long back track to make!

 

Ah! the man that began this whole travesty.