Nothing? Did you actually look at the photo, or just peek between your fingers? There is nothing visible that could be considered "revealing" at all. It's a great photo that conveys a sense of innocence and happy unity. Very American in it's message. I wouldn't be surprised to see it in art class at any age level. Do you really want to waste the time and energy to protest this pic? You must have books to burn or something.
How's that answer coming along? Still composing it? You wouldn't want us to lose a bunch of respect for you, would you? How's that link coming along, Papa? Making any progress?
Seriously dude, what the fuck are you talking about? The link that KingSpeed provided is not a pedo site.
He's claiming that the image originally was posted on a "pedo site" before being reposted on that tumblr page.
I know what he's claiming, I just don't see any proof of it. All I can go on is the link that KS originally posted. That one seems fine.
PapaG may be entirely correct that a pedophile might find the photo to be sexually exciting. It does have children in it, after all. I can't say for certain because I don't think like a pedophile. I don't think the average person would see anything of a sexual nature in the photo at all.
PapaG pretending to be outraged about something every couple of weeks is one of the things that makes this board fun.