OT NBA Finally Ready To Make Rule Change On Hack-A-Player

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by BigGameDamian, Feb 5, 2016.

  1. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,402
    Likes Received:
    6,323
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My feeling exactly. I HATE when the last 2 minutes of a game turn into a 30 minute parade to the FT line.

    You can say "make your FTs", but I say "play clean defense". Intentional rule violations should not be rewarded.
     
  2. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    32,053
    Likes Received:
    40,410
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The problem is that the penalty for fouling--you know, the actual violation of the rules--is no longer sufficient to prevent teams from benefiting from that rule violation. I like to see the game played as intended. Free throws were supposed to be a penalty, not an objective.
     
    riverman likes this.
  3. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    66,375
    Likes Received:
    64,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is an interesting topic....the fact is that these changes will become accepted and folks will move on if they implement them. In tennis challenging a line call has really improved the game with super efficient replay...takes a split second to rule on it. Better than John McEnroe screaming at a line judge for 10 minutes like the old days....in football, it's backfired for me...they seem to review every frickin' call and the refs are on the screen more than the quarterback.
     
  4. Chris Craig

    Chris Craig (Blazersland) I'm Your Huckleberry Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    53,696
    Likes Received:
    54,786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The refs definetly need to let teams play more...
     
  5. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    32,053
    Likes Received:
    40,410
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Agreed. "Contact" that doesn't result in an advantage shouldn't be called. Shooters shouldn't be able to draw fouls when they initiate the contact. And the ones that really drive me nuts are when two bigs are pushing against each other for position, and then one just throws himself to the side to draw the loose-ball foul.
     
    Chris Craig likes this.
  6. tlongII

    tlongII Legendary Poster

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    16,496
    Likes Received:
    10,975
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Systems Analyst
    Location:
    Beaverton, Oregon
    They are benefitting from the opponent's inability to shoot free throws which is a skill that all NBA players should be proficient at.
     
    Chris Craig likes this.
  7. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    32,053
    Likes Received:
    40,410
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes. They break the rules, and benefit. You can elaborate all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that they break the rules, and then benefit from doing so.
     
    riverman and Chris Craig like this.
  8. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    32,053
    Likes Received:
    40,410
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The question to ask yourself is: Is the game of basketball as a whole better when there are more fouls and free throws or fewer?
     
  9. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,374
    Likes Received:
    27,196
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why move it closer? Lol

    The key, for the NBA it is 16 feet (4.9 m) wide, for the NCAA it is 12 feet (3.7 m) wide; for both instances it extends 15 feet (4.6 m) from the backboard.
     
  10. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,374
    Likes Received:
    27,196
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This already occurs. Hack a whoever is an off ball foul.
     
  11. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    32,053
    Likes Received:
    40,410
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm glad you're here. What's "The Rappin' Referree's" take on this issue?
     
  12. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    32,711
    Likes Received:
    22,761
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Ok, how about this. There is a 'wheel of fortune' that the player who is fouled spins. The options include 1 to 3 foul shots, side out, disqualification of the fouling player, disqualification of the fouled player, reversal of the game score at the time, do-over, foul shots but from half-court, replacement of fouling player with randomly chosen fan, fouling player forced to eat 10 hot dogs before play resumes, etc.

    barfo
     
    noknobs likes this.
  13. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    66,375
    Likes Received:
    64,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yes it does...but what I envision Silver addressing is not something familiar so we don't really have any examples to justify it yet. Sports rules have changed all my life...with the exception of the NFL...I've liked most of the changes.
     
  14. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,374
    Likes Received:
    27,196
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think the rule should be left as is.

    Hit your Goddamn free throws
     
  15. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,374
    Likes Received:
    27,196
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sports rules don't change to protect players weaknesses unless it is a safety issue. Name one rule change that was done to protect a player's weakness.
     
    BlazerWookee likes this.
  16. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    66,375
    Likes Received:
    64,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm hoping to see the rule change personally....watched the Ducks destroy Colorado last night and the crowd was going crazy until the last two minutes of intentional fouling...then everyone was headed for the exits before the game was over...why? Nobody needed to watch free throws at that point...I imagine folks watching TV were channel surfing about then. I don't see it as a selling point
     
  17. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    32,053
    Likes Received:
    40,410
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well who cares what you think?! :devilwink:
     
    dviss1 likes this.
  18. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    66,375
    Likes Received:
    64,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    3pt shot....paint challenged players could put up big numbers without sucking at driving the lane....that's their weakness...should they put it back to a 2 pt shot because they suck at layups?
     
    Denny Crane likes this.
  19. BlazerWookee

    BlazerWookee UNTILT THE DAMN PINWHEEL!

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    12,804
    Likes Received:
    5,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Gear Finisher
    Location:
    Lebanon, Oregon
    And they benefit from doing so only because of a glaring weakness in the opponent's game, one that can be remedied by taking the no-free-throw-shooting player out of the game.
     
  20. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    32,053
    Likes Received:
    40,410
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The hand-checking rule was changed because perimeter players couldn't shake defenders while being hand-checked.
    The "Charles Barkley" rule, because post defenders couldn't stop players backing them down into the key.
    Offensive and defensive weaknesses protected by rule changes.
     
    riverman likes this.

Share This Page