<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (danxcr @ Jul 27 2008, 10:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>LOL... this might be too early for Yi </div> No, there's still another extremely popular player in China that's still available. Wouldn't put it past him to select this player in mind...and it would actually be a pretty good pick, IMO - or at least, it wouldn't be a terrible pick.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Jul 27 2008, 10:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (danxcr @ Jul 27 2008, 10:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>LOL... this might be too early for Yi </div> No, there's still another extremely popular player in China that's still available. Wouldn't put it past him to select this player in mind...and it would actually be a pretty good pick, IMO - or at least, it wouldn't be a terrible pick. </div> ummm if ur talking about Yao he was taken lol
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jtballa2o1 @ Jul 27 2008, 11:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Jul 27 2008, 10:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (danxcr @ Jul 27 2008, 10:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>LOL... this might be too early for Yi </div> No, there's still another extremely popular player in China that's still available. Wouldn't put it past him to select this player in mind...and it would actually be a pretty good pick, IMO - or at least, it wouldn't be a terrible pick. </div> ummm if ur talking about Yao he was taken lol </div> This player in mind is not Chinese
no, it's a certain mr. mcgrady. i guess he's alright but his playoff record and shot selection have often been under the suspicion of sucking.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (syc514 @ Jul 27 2008, 11:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>no, it's a certain mr. mcgrady. i guess he's alright but his playoff record and shot selection have often been under the suspicion of sucking.</div> Yup. Another ~35 minutes until you pick! These drafts are weird. in a short period of time, like 6 picks are made, then we gotta wait 6 hours for the guy that's gonna get skipped
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jul 27 2008, 10:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>No one has taken Ch_is Web_er yet. </div> how'd you know Chois Webier was gonna be my next pick edit: guilty of using a lame joke a minute late
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jul 27 2008, 05:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Out of the 12 players taken ahead of Deron Williams, I agree with five, there are two more that I would probably not take over him but I'd have to think hard about it, and five more that I wouldn't even consider.</div> Pierce wasn't taken when I posted this, so add him to the "wouldn't even consider" category.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jul 27 2008, 11:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>No one has taken Ch_is Web_er yet. </div>
wouldn't this draft have been a lot more effective if we all agreed to use a chatroom or something on a certain day at a certain time that the most ppl could make it on? I understand that the offseason is long and we want something to do but I can see people definitely losing interest in the long run.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (syc514 @ Jul 27 2008, 10:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>wouldn't this draft have been a lot more effective if we all agreed to use a chatroom or something on a certain day at a certain time that the most ppl could make it on? I understand that the offseason is long and we want something to do but I can see people definitely losing interest in the long run.</div> its always been like this. And we couldn't get 30 people in a chatroom at the same time for long enough. Plus this is more of a thing to pass time.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (User01 @ Jul 27 2008, 11:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (syc514 @ Jul 27 2008, 10:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>wouldn't this draft have been a lot more effective if we all agreed to use a chatroom or something on a certain day at a certain time that the most ppl could make it on? I understand that the offseason is long and we want something to do but I can see people definitely losing interest in the long run.</div> its always been like this. And we couldn't get 30 people in a chatroom at the same time for long enough. Plus this is more of a thing to pass time. </div> Well I think it could work, just at the start of the sign-up say. This draft will occur on Saturday at 3 PM Eastern time, each person will have a maximum of 10 minutes drafting time. If a person doesn't show up then they will be replaced by someone on the waiting list.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Lavalamp @ Jul 27 2008, 10:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (User01 @ Jul 27 2008, 11:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (syc514 @ Jul 27 2008, 10:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>wouldn't this draft have been a lot more effective if we all agreed to use a chatroom or something on a certain day at a certain time that the most ppl could make it on? I understand that the offseason is long and we want something to do but I can see people definitely losing interest in the long run.</div> its always been like this. And we couldn't get 30 people in a chatroom at the same time for long enough. Plus this is more of a thing to pass time. </div> Well I think it could work, just at the start of the sign-up say. This draft will occur on Saturday at 3 PM Eastern time, each person will have a maximum of 10 minutes drafting time. If a person doesn't show up then they will be replaced by someone on the waiting list. </div> Finding 30 people who could all be online at the same time could be difficult. and 30 picks/round*10 minutes/pick*12 rounds=60 hours. so that wouldn't really work either. even if people just take 1 minute/pick, its still 6 hours on line. I do have another idea, however, but it would hinder trading until after the draft, or during rounds if no one falls that you like.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Jul 27 2008, 11:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (syc514 @ Jul 27 2008, 11:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>no, it's a certain mr. mcgrady. i guess he's alright but his playoff record and shot selection have often been under the suspicion of sucking.</div> Yup. Another ~35 minutes until you pick! </div> Where'd you go?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Jul 28 2008, 12:04 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Jul 27 2008, 11:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (syc514 @ Jul 27 2008, 11:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>no, it's a certain mr. mcgrady. i guess he's alright but his playoff record and shot selection have often been under the suspicion of sucking.</div> Yup. Another ~35 minutes until you pick! </div> Where'd you go? </div> logik15 and syc514 are both online.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JCB @ Jul 28 2008, 12:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Was logik pm'ed? He know it is/was his turn?</div> I just PM'd both of them. logik said he is picking now.
