NBA Power Rankings

Discussion in 'Brooklyn Nets' started by xflavioVC15x, Oct 27, 2008.

  1. Mr. J

    Mr. J Triple Up

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    9,912
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    New York, NY
    Nice job adding players that aren't in the rotation.
     
  2. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,976
    Likes Received:
    10,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    24.New York
    25.New Jersey

    That's gotta hurt.
     
  3. Dumpy

    Dumpy Yi-ha!!

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    4,231
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The writer is a clueless Knick fan.
     
  4. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,976
    Likes Received:
    10,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Agrees with the oddsmakers.
     
  5. xflavioVC15x

    xflavioVC15x Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    927
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Lodi NJ
    Spike Lee ??
     
  6. Dumpy

    Dumpy Yi-ha!!

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    4,231
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I think the Nets are being undervalued. I have them pencilled in for 35-40 wins, but missing the playoffs. They will start slow, but play better over the course of the year. Over the last six weeks, their depth will allow them to beat a bunch of injury-wreaked teams and they will finish the season on a 10-6 run or so.
     
  7. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,976
    Likes Received:
    10,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Sorry, I don't see it. More like they start off slow, play the middle slow, finish slow, and it won't be too long before Vince looks like he's mailing it in.

    It's not bad news, though. You generally have to suck for a few years to rebuild.
     
  8. Денг Гордон

    Денг Гордон Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,039
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbia, MO
    I have right now. So to apply last year's records to this, you would have:

    1. Boston Celtics
    2. Detroit Pistons
    3. San Antonio Spurs
    4. Utah Jazz
    5. Los Angeles Lakers
    6. Houston Rockets
    7. New Orleans Hornets
    8. Orlando Magic
    9. Cleveland Cavs
    10. Phoenix Suns
    11. Dallas Mavericks
    12. Denver Nuggets
    13. Philadelphia 76ers
    14. Portland Trailblazers
    15. Chicago Bulls
    16. Washington Wizards
    17. Toronto Raptors
    18. Golden St. Warriors
    19. Atlanta Hawks
    20. Indiana Pacers
    21. Sacramento Kings
    22. New Jersey Nets
    23. Charlotte Bobcats
    24. Milwaukee Bucks
    25. Los Angeles Clippers
    26. Miami Heat
    27. Memphis Grizzlies
    28. Oklahoma City Thunder
    29. New York Knicks
    30. Minnesota Timberwolves

    http://www.dabullz.com/search?q=power rankings
     
  9. Mr. J

    Mr. J Triple Up

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    9,912
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    New York, NY
    It's good to see I'm not the only one who shares such an opinion.
     
  10. Dumpy

    Dumpy Yi-ha!!

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    4,231
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I fully recognize that I have a minority opinion here. I just don't think that this team is so much worse than all but the top six or seven teams in the conference. That's not to say that I think they'll be a playoff team, just that they'll be competitive with the rest of those teams once they figure out how to play together.
     
  11. FOMW

    FOMW Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2007
    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I'm with you, Dumpy. (BTW, just read your terrific piece at Nets Daily. Nice job!)

    I'm predicting 37-42 wins. Having seen all but one preseason game, I'm certain that this team is going to be AT LEAST average offensively on the year, though I suspect they will have high turnovers early in the year and fewer assists than they will have in February forward. By the later part of the season, I think they will be darn good offensively, so long as Harris and Carter are healthy. I firmly believe that Anderson will find his shot as he gets more and more comfortable knowing when and where they're coming. His form, length, and efficiency history are too good to believe otherwise at this point. And Yi, Lopez, Hayes, and Simmons are all better shooters than the Nets have had in any similar roles in the 4 years that I've been watching them. Not to mention that Lopez, based only on preseason games, looks to have more low post offense as a raw rookie than any Net bigman I've ever seen.

    The evolution of their defense will tell the tale more than anything. With two of the big keys there -- Najera and Dooling -- having played so very little in preseason, it's tough to say how that will go. I'm also not entirely sure that Frank's defensive philosophy (paint protection at all costs) and schemes are always necessarily the best ones out there for today's game. But he's nothing if not hardworking and self critical, so I trust that he will adjust if and when he sees it's prudent to do so.

    Ultimately I do think the team will be at least respectable defensively because I think they have a lot of high IQ (if young) players who really want to do well. They also have a couple of bulldogs (Dooling and Najera) to show them the way. And they combine that with decent team-wide athleticism and length, so there aren't glaring physical disadvantages to playing good team defense.

    I think that's enough to get them a 7th or 8th playoff spot, or to miss it by not more than a hair.
     
  12. Dumpy

    Dumpy Yi-ha!!

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    4,231
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Thanks! There is a lot in there that we discussed during the course of the summer.

    People who dismiss the Nets are overrating the depth of some of the other teams. Many teams are reliant on at least one unproven player in their starting lineup, and many teams have (in my view) a far shallower bench. I also think (obviously) that the nets have gone out and collected players that should theoretically operate well together, and methodically rid themselves of their worst defensive players. The Nets are just one "star" short of many of the other teams, but "stars" by themselves do not ensure success. These Nets will not be selfish.

    The turnovers will go down within a few weeks, and the defense will get better. It happens every year for EVERY team. The Nets have been behind other teams throughout the preseason; their first game was the Heat's second game, etc.

    I can envision them getting off to a poor start (so what else is new), but gradually improving. I think it will be fun to watch.
     
  13. GMJ

    GMJ Suspended

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,067
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Odds are designed to influence gamblers to bet on a particular team, they're NOT a direct representation of their basketball opinion.
     
  14. Claud

    Claud Legendary

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Messages:
    3,402
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Full-time Student
    You really think 35-40 wins will not be enough to get into the playoffs in the east?
     
  15. Dumpy

    Dumpy Yi-ha!!

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    4,231
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    My fearless prediction is that they will win 39 games and miss the playoffs by one or two. It's possible that 39 will be enough.
     

Share This Page