It's amusing that you demand evidence when it comes to Trump, but for Clinton your feelings about her feelings is sufficient proof. barfo
FBI and CIA think there is some evidence. Sandy hook False Flag, Pizzagate, Birthterism, widespread voter fraud and other crazy conspiracies are still held as true by many conservatives despite being discredited.
They found she deliberately destroyed evidence which had been subpoenaed, both devices and emails, to obstruct justice. A felony. They found she forwarded classified emails to friends, donors and foreign countries. Felonious treason. They found she sold access to her office, charging personal donations in tens of millions of dollars which she laundered through her faux charity the Clinton Foundation. Treason, felonies, and fraud. They found her foundation (her family) illegally siphoned off hundreds of millions of tax dollars meant to be spent to save Haitians lives. Justice will eventually be served, the only mystery being will the Clintons off themselves to avoid prosecution or will they die in jail.
All this bullshit was and still is on our dime. It is as if we are paying for professional lunacy. Once lawyers becomes a politicians, they morph into omnipotent lords.
Nay! We have dead men to vouch for her and video of her telling whoppers about some fucking video is to blame. But it is not amusing that you can't see the difference.
Ha! A thought just came that brought a chuckle. The Dems will go even further a far if and when the New FBI director does what Comey failed to do. That is simple act on the evidence against Clinton, not act as the prosecutor but present it to the AG for possible prosecution. There are men in prison today for mishandling classified material, with far less criminal intent than Clinton. If we get a competent director, he will not be encumbered by need to know her intent. Judges and juries have that burden when it is mitigating. In her case, I don't think it matters.
I think this is becoming more likely now. Putting Clinton on trial will change the shit out of the talking points being discussed.
I think it's odd that Trumpsters keep saying there's "no evidence." You don't know that. You have zero way of knowing that. None of us do. So why are you so confident there isn't any? Simply because it's not public? Wouldn't that be counterintuitive to an "investigation?"
A number of people have said there is none. None brought forth now. It is way past due if any exists.
