He was the absolute KING of one liners. I watched that "Part 3" video that I posted above, and that skit with Kane and Benoit, where he tells Kane to find Benoit's penis, had me in tears from laughing so hard. Man, I miss that shit. The WWE today is such shit.
We're always going to disagree on gun safety laws. What people don't seem to understand is that you can't operate on the premise that: "guns don't kill people people kill people" Without understanding that our point of view is that we want to put background checks on people not guns. The safety laws are for people. People are forced to get insurance on your car they should also be forced to get insurance on their firearm. Also, y'all want to talk about Mental Health but never have any course of action on what to do to get Firearms out of the hands of people with mental illness. Don't talk about it, be about it. And news flash, the NRA doesn't give a shit about you or the Second Amendment. They only want to sell you more guns and that's the reason why they operate the way they do. They are for the corporations not the people.
The rock is a republican. I am not well versed on his complete views, but i would believe he believes in gun rights.
That clip is ruined by the goat bearded chode with the blonde hair and no mic skills (can't stand Jericho).
Yes, we'll always disagree on this. Which is why I'm no longer a Liberal. And what YOUR side doesn't understand is that background checks already exist. I have argued this until I was blue in the face, but some people just DON'T get it. I don't understand why people argue with gun owners about this. Do you think we're blowing smoke out of our asses here? Dviss, that would be like me arguing with you about what it's like to be a black man. I wouldn't dream to do that, so why do you argue with actual gun owners about the 2nd Amendment and, more specifically, about background checks? It makes ZERO sense to me. So if I get insurance on my gun....will that cover my ass in the chance that I have to lawfully use that gun to protect myself with? And you don't think anti-gun organizations would have a problem with that? Oh....they would? Oh, I see....so you want insurance on our firearms to punish us then, right? There are too many ways for insurance requirements on firearms to be abused by both the courts and the government. Far more ways than I care to explain here. Patient Privacy Laws. My mental health, and indeed the mental health of all Americans, is PRIVATE. That privacy shouldn't have to be suspended just because I want to exercise my Civil Right to own a firearm. It's not the government's business what anyone's mental health is, and I'm surprised that I would have to explain that to someone who's a Liberal. Oh give me a break. Did you know that many Liberals actually believe that the NRA manufactures guns? No shit, I'm not making that up. The last source that I checked that didn't have MDA and Bloomberg's name on it, the NRA's main source of income was from NRA members, not the corporations. A few thousand dollar sponsorships here and there for ads is hardly a big source of income for an organization as big as the NRA.
And what YOUR side doesn't understand is that background checks already exist. I have argued this until I was blue in the face, but some people just DON'T get it. I don't understand why people argue with gun owners about this. Do you think we're blowing smoke out of our asses here? There are NOT background checks for lots of Internet sales so don't blow smoke. Dviss, that would be like me arguing with you about what it's like to be a black man. I wouldn't dream to do that, so why do you argue with actual gun owners about the 2nd Amendment and, more specifically, about background checks? It makes ZERO sense to me. I used to be a buyer and seller of guns. Don't assume you know me. So if I get insurance on my gun....will that cover my ass in the chance that I have to lawfully use that gun to protect myself with? Why not? And you don't think anti-gun organizations would have a problem with that? Oh....they would? Why would they? They're advocating for it. Oh, I see....so you want insurance on our firearms to punish us then, right? If there is a "terrble tragedy" that occurs because of your negligence with the firearm you should be held accountable. There are too many ways for insurance requirements on firearms to be abused by both the courts and the government. Far more ways than I care to explain here. Patient Privacy Laws. My mental health, and indeed the mental health of all Americans, is PRIVATE. That privacy shouldn't have to be suspended just because I want to exercise my Civil Right to own a firearm. It's not the government's business what anyone's mental health is, and I'm surprised that I would have to explain that to someone who's a Liberal. So that means you're blowing smoke up everybody's ass is when y'all say you want to do something about the mentally ill. Also, it seems like your people is completely fine with having a registry of people who purchase marijuana in our state but not for those who purchase guns.... Riddle me that... Oh give me a break. Did you know that many Liberals actually believe that the NRA manufactures guns? No shit, I'm not making that up. The last source that I checked that didn't have MDA and Bloomberg's name on it, the NRA's main source of income was from NRA members, not the corporations. A few thousand dollar sponsorships here and there for ads is hardly a big source of income for an organization as big as the NRA. That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. The majority of liberals do not believe that the NRA manufactures guns get the fuck out of here with that crap. I'm sure there are a fringe few of us. But there are a fringe few of y'all who believed that Obama should have done something to prevent 9/11 when he wasn't in office... Don't bring up a red herring to debate with me because that's not something that I believe in. Now that I've refuted that level of crap, it is true that they are lobbying simply to continue to increase firearm sales. The amount of money that is given to the NRA is given by their members because it's dues They're not lobbying for the 2nd Amendment. That's simply a tool they use to continue to enrich gun manufacturers.
hey......that's why his action figure has red shorts I'm guessing.....try to joke and the debates start comin'....
Just because you seen this on a few sites doesn't mean it's true. He was at one time a registered independent and nobody knows what he's registered as now. A Republican would never be caught dead at the Democratic Convention but he was there... So no one really knows what his political affiliation is. There are many sites that say he's politically ambiguous.
Its called google. I know technology is hard for you in your old age. But im here to help if you need. Millenials will show you the way.
What about the one that's like Craigslist? https://www.armslist.com They put people in connection with each other to sell firearms with no background checks.
