Re: NFC EAST - Who Win! <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Capt. Comeback @ Jun 26 2006, 08:26 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Let me ask you this, do any of your recievers have this thing we call a Super Bowl ring? And also, how many yards did your other recievers combine for? I'm too lazy to look that up.</div>Besides Randel El and Patten who you bought, does any of yours?Cause if you want to start talking about players you bought then the New York Jets have more super bowl rings on their players then the Redskins do. What does it prove? Absolutely nothing.
Re: NFC EAST - Who Win! [/quote] Let me ask you this, do any of your recievers have this thing we call a Super Bowl ring? And also, how many yards did your other recievers combine for? I'm too lazy to look that up.[/quote]No receiver on Dallas has a Superbowl ring, which proves absolutely nothing!Last year, the Cowboys were the only team in the NFL to have three different players with at least 60 catches and 750 yards in Glenn (62 catches for 1,136 yards), Keyshawn Johnson (71 for 839) and Witten (66 for 757).That's a total of 2732 yards and 2551 yards from the Redskins top 3 receivers. Again this is coming from a not so good line. But the more I think about it, Dallas doesn't need to have a great line this year. Last year teams blitz us like crazy because the only person Dallas had to double was Glenn. But now it will be very hard to blitz with you have T.O. and Glenn in the line up. Not to mention Witten and Fascano, who by the way is being said to be very impressive so far. So it'll be interesting to see how it all plays out.So in saying that I do think that Dallas will win the NFC East - I know I'm a homer but just like Redskins fans!
Re: NFC EAST - Who Win! Here are the numbers from the Redskins major players (receivers) next year from last year:1.) Santana Moss - 1483 yards - 84 catches2.) Brandon Lloyd - 733 yards - 48 catches3.) Antwaan Randle El - 558 yards - 35 catches4.) Chris Cooley - 774 yards - 71 catchesBetween those 4 guys, we are looking at 14.9 yards per catch based on last season as a whole group. Not too shabby.3,548 yards man, off 238 catches. Considering Brunell completed 262 passes last year and has shown his ability to complete more than 350 in a season (1996), I see at least 3,548 yards out of him (if not more) as a fairly realistic number. If you multiply that group's average by 350 completions you get 5,215 yards. Even off 300 completions we are looking at a number almost more than 1,000 more than Peyton Manning had last year. Not that I am putting Brunell on the same level as Manning but I am saying that our group next year is going to be very dynamic and explosive much like the Colts offense. Hell, it could even be better. Even if you take Cooley's yards out thats way more than both the Cowboys and the Redskins top 3 from last year. We have improved more.
Re: NFC EAST - Who Win! <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Johnny White Guy @ Jun 26 2006, 01:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Here are the numbers from the Redskins major players (receivers) next year from last year:1.) Santana Moss - 1483 yards - 84 catches2.) Brandon Lloyd - 733 yards - 48 catches3.) Antwaan Randle El - 558 yards - 35 catches4.) Chris Cooley - 774 yards - 71 catchesBetween those 4 guys, we are looking at 14.9 yards per catch based on last season as a whole group. Not too shabby.3,548 yards man, off 238 catches. Considering Brunell completed 262 passes last year and has shown his ability to complete more than 350 in a season (1996), I see at least 3,548 yards out of him (if not more) as a fairly realistic number.</div>I do believe that is realistic as well. I mean you guys have receivers to get the job done. My only question is being that they are all under 6ft. Is that a disadvantage or an advantage? I think Moss is a rare exception to the rule. But as far as Brunell goes, if he stays health (and that is key...of course for any team) he could have more than 3548 yards. Like I said once before Bledsoe, had Adams not gotten hurt, was on pace for 4200 yards. So I do think Brunell can get the job done. I'm just not banking too much on your receivers.
Re: NFC EAST - Who Win! I'll say it again, and echo guys like Venom who seem to know what their talking about...The Redskins receiver corps are OVERRATED. Lloyd and Randle El have proven absolutely nothing in this league. Randle El has returned kicks, but other than the occational trick play he has never shown anyone that he's an NFL wide receiver. I think he can make the list of top 10 overrated players in the league.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>It is, isn't it?By the way that wasn't an essay, and if it was, it wasn't written correctly in the proper format. Besides your 10 paragraph "essay" was complete bullshit and the Eagles won't contend for the NFC East.</div>Who the hell ever called it an essay? And again, please explain. I wanna hear why the Eagles won't compete. And don't tell me why the Skins are "so great", tell me why the EAGLES don't have what it takes. Explain it position by position.
Re: NFC EAST - Who Win! That is an essay, retard. Do you know what an essay does in writing? It pursuades or tries to prove a point, in which case that's what you attempted.Anyhow, the Eagles have too many holes to fill and can't get that done by the end of offseason. You need a more complete RB, recievers, and your offensive line is turning into a pile of shit. Your defense is old and crumbly, with the exception of Sheldon Brown and Lito Sheppared. Face it you have no weapons anymore, and don't tell me McNabb to L.J. will get you through the season.
Re: NFC EAST - Who Win! The Giants actually have a team who can play together, the 'skins are gonna have alot of fighting with 3 great recievers.
Re: NFC EAST - Who Win! I wouldn't say that the Giants have 3 great recievers. You can't tell with Sinorice yet, Plaxico didn't product as much as people wanted him to last year, and Amani is getting older and less productive.
Re: NFC EAST - Who Win! <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Capt. Comeback @ Jun 26 2006, 11:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Anyhow, the Eagles have too many holes to fill and can't get that done by the end of offseason. You need a more complete RB, recievers, and your offensive line is turning into a pile of shit. Your defense is old and crumbly, with the exception of Sheldon Brown and Lito Sheppared. Face it you have no weapons anymore, and don't tell me McNabb to L.J. will get you through the season.</div>Ok, now go and read my "essay" post so that I dont have to go ahead and repeat what I said about the running game and WRs, the two things I said everyone is going to immediately point to. Maybe if you had read it in the first place you wouldn't even be arguing with me in the first place.The offensive line just got a huge dose of youth. Jean-Gilles and Herremans, a rookie and second year player respectively, will be battling for the LG job. Runyan hasn't shown a sign of declining, and we re-signed him for a reason. Shawn Andrews was just locked up long term and was our first round pick three seasons ago, he's still young. Tra Thomas is a questionmark at LT but we have Winston Justice ready to step in when needed. Hank Fraley is a liability at center, but Jamaal Jackson did a great job filling in for him last year and should actually challenge him for a job. The offensive line is in great shape, half of it just got hurt last year.The defense is too old?? Kearse, Trotter and Dawkins you can argue but they're all still extremely productive. Everyone else who will play a significant role is on the right side of 30.Again, I want to see you name names and give particular reasons. Not just general statements like "the line is turning into a pile of shit". I dont know about other people here, but I don't buy that crap.
Re: NFC EAST - Who Win! C'mon Captain, I'm sure youve looked at this thread once in the past 5 days..
