No shorts or deal coming soon but not the greatest rumor

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Mediocre Man, Jun 20, 2023.

  1. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,684
    Likes Received:
    2,779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Nurk:
    • As a Blazer: He's fine. Not great, and paid for being "fine", but definitely an NBA starting-level guy. I have been pleased with his three point shooting coming along, and it's hard to tell how injured he's really been the last couple of years, given our back-to-back tank jobs.
    • No reasonable alternative: We currently have no reasonable player to plug in at the center spot and he is, what, one of two guys on our roster taller than 6'9"? Unless there's some mental/interpersonal thing where we NEED to get rid of him, I can't imagine getting a player that is about as good but fits better without giving up additional value... maybe someone like Capela? I just don't know what value he has elsewhere, but there's always a transaction cost even when you swap "equal" guys unless another team values Nurk more than we do or their guy less than we do. Of the problems this team has, Nurk is low on the list for me.
    Ant:
    • As a Blazer: He's young, he's not overpaid, and he's still getting better. It's hard for me to believe this was his first year as a starter, but it was. With more run and more experience I suspect he'll continue to get better, and perhaps a lot better (given how much he's improved in the first four years of his Blazers career).
    • Value to other teams: He doesn't seem to be being respected as an asset, but more of a salary match. More than Nurk, I think he's a net-positive and I don't want him to be a throw-in for an older guy that will probably have about as much impact as Grant did last year (which is to say: not much). I look at it as similar to Herro in Miami... is any team excited to trade for him? No. Is Miami excited about his future as a Heat? Yes (unless they can use him to get a superstar like Dame).
    • Depth and rotation:
      • I think Dame/Ant/Sharpe/Scoot is actually a pretty good rotation... 96 combined minutes in the back court and maybe half the game at the 3 for Sharpe seems reasonable; that's 30 minutes each on average. And also remember that we get injuries just like everyone else, and I'd rather have four quality guys than scraping the bottom the barrel to fill in if a couple of guys go down.
      • Even if they ARE healthy, Scoot will be a rookie, Sharpe will be 20, and Ant will still be 24... they aren't going to be in a reasonable position to demand a trade or make a lot of noise if they don't play 30 minutes a night. Further, I don't think Dame should be playing 36 minutes a game... he's getting older and if we're going to have a chance to be good in the next couple of years, we need him to be healthy and ready to go. Having three hopefully reasonable options to carry the scoring load in the back court should help Chauncey not run him into the ground like he seemed to be doing with starters this season before Operation: Shutdown.
      • I agree that there is a lot of talent there, but there's not a lot of financial investment. If we have Dame, CJ, Powell, and (Sharpe or Scoot), we'd be using up a MASSIVE part of our salary cap. Due to Sharpe and Scott being so cheap, it doesn't hurt to have a starting-level guy (with associated salary obligations) in Simons on the team, too.
     
  2. PDXFonz

    PDXFonz I’m listening

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    19,484
    Likes Received:
    16,084
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Whoops. Didn’t realize he was just traded
     
  3. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,272
    Likes Received:
    26,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Would have been fantastic 5 years ago
     
  4. PDXFonz

    PDXFonz I’m listening

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    19,484
    Likes Received:
    16,084
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Draymond
     
  5. Tince

    Tince Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    15,259
    Likes Received:
    14,715
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Very well thought out response!

    Hard to know that teams don't value either of those guys in comparison to players they are willing to trade.

    I don't hate Nurk at all. However, I would think a more durable and mobile center would have more value given the roster having no quality backup center and the style of defense we appeared to be trying to play last year.

    It's hard for me to imagine both those guys values are being maximized in Portland given the situation. We simply see it differently
     
  6. Fairly-Hard

    Fairly-Hard Former Member Gone New!

    Joined:
    May 2, 2021
    Messages:
    9,062
    Likes Received:
    7,411
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Currently the apartment in the Moda
    This has Al Horford all over it.
     
    PtldPlatypus and Cugel like this.
  7. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,527
    Likes Received:
    16,551
    Trophy Points:
    113
    MM is legit.
     
    TBpup likes this.
  8. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,577
    Likes Received:
    34,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    Need some help from the Cap gurus.

    IF.....Portland were to get Zion + for Scoot, how would that work Before and After January 1? He is on his smaller contract now and the new one kicks in starting July IIUC. What would need to go out now versus what would need to go out after July 1? My understanding is the cap impact would be different in terms of what we would ship out and what would come back. We have so few tradable contracts that would seem to make it more difficult.

    Thank you in advance.
     
  9. blazedanugz

    blazedanugz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2010
    Messages:
    2,170
    Likes Received:
    1,522
    Trophy Points:
    113

    I’m not an expert but I believe we have to match the money of his salary for next year regardless…the poison pill contract
     
    blazerkor likes this.
  10. SwissBlazer

    SwissBlazer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2016
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    1,670
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Exactly there is a difference between now and after July 1st. He is on Poison Pill Provision because his 1st year of extension hasn't kicked yet.

    Outgoing salary is his actual salary (13,5M) and incoming has to be the average salary of his extension (34,6M). That would make a 2 teams trade really difficult for Portland.
     
    blazedanugz and TBpup like this.
  11. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,577
    Likes Received:
    34,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    I thought I saw somewhere that Portland would have to send out players to match his contract now, but be able to take on the @@ for next year. Come July 1, they would have to send out matching salaries. Not sure how that works (if that is the case) but trying to get clarification from those who know the CBA well.
     
  12. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,577
    Likes Received:
    34,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    Thank you @SwissBlazer So if Portland got rid of some of their cap holds (i.e., Cam Reddish), what players would go out for Portland now, vs what would have to go out in a couple of weeks? And could we create enough cap space to take on an unbalanced trade, if that were even an option?
     
    SwissBlazer likes this.
  13. blazedanugz

    blazedanugz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2010
    Messages:
    2,170
    Likes Received:
    1,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so we would have to take back more salary in this trade other than Zion to get to 34.5?
     
  14. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,577
    Likes Received:
    34,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    I would want more than just Zion for #3. There is so much risk with him (and upside) that I want another young player (Murphy or Jones) and #14. Zion's downside is huge and the money going forward combined with Dame's combined with Grant will be somewhat prohibitive in a couple of years.
     
    Eastoff, UKRAINEFAN, AmirIcon and 2 others like this.
  15. blazedanugz

    blazedanugz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2010
    Messages:
    2,170
    Likes Received:
    1,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    oh yeah I agree just trying to figure out exactly how the poison pill thing works
     
    TBpup likes this.
  16. Fitz303

    Fitz303 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2017
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    385
    Trophy Points:
    63
    In the current year, I believe, the team getting Zion takes on $34,639,137 (take the 5 years of extension money, current year salary, and get the average of those 6 years), and the Pelicans send out $13,534,817 (just current year salary). They can only take back a maximum of 17,018,521, while the team getting Zion has to send out a minimum of 27,631,310 (125% rule). It makes PPP deals very difficult with 2 teams unless the team getting the player has cap space, or if a 3rd team is involved to absorb salary.

    I have to imagine any deal with Portland and Zion would just be completed on July 1. Makes things much less messy
     
    CJ_is_Gone, ebott and TBpup like this.
  17. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,577
    Likes Received:
    34,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    Okay, so if it is after July 1, if we have cap space, it can be an unbalanced trade but more easily done? Then we could take back a player like Murphy into the Payton TPE or Jones into the Hart TPE? Just trying to put the pieces together.....in case.
     
    Natebishop3 likes this.
  18. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,272
    Likes Received:
    26,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I’m an idiot in all things cap, but luckily, no sarcasm, I think Joe is knows to be a very good capologist
     
    Eastoff and TBpup like this.
  19. Fitz303

    Fitz303 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2017
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    385
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Yeah at July 1, they just have to get within 125% of the other's salaries (Blazers wont have any cap space but the PPP is gone on Zion). Murphy or Jones easily fits into TPEs (that deal can actually be done right away, before the zion deal finalizes, if they want). Blazers just need to come up with $26,720,000 outgoing to make a legal trade for Zion's contract
     
    CJ_is_Gone likes this.
  20. RonBrewer

    RonBrewer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2015
    Messages:
    1,304
    Likes Received:
    2,185
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If we can get Zion and another piece along with 14 for 3. I'm on board with it. If that scenario panned out, do you think we would hear about it prior to July 1?
     

Share This Page