...O/T...I am so sick of this type thing;

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Status
Not open for further replies.
BigDaddyAl got it right. But most of the people alive in the 1950s were not likely born into slavery or even to former slaves.

About the 2nd paragraph - we've come a long long way in the past 50 years, which is great. It's a work in progress, though, and we're not done making this country fair or people wouldn't be complaining.



...you've totally missed the point, again...not that I'm surprised.
 
Unfortunately Denny there are also those people who complain just for the sake of complaining because its the only way to get attention. I refer to the Al Sharpton's of the world.

Sharpton is a clown, but he's also done a lot for civil rights for black people. Getting attention is part of what's needed.

BigDaddyAl got it right again. We may be seeing a lot less overt racism over the past 50 years, but there is a lot of covert racism still here, and there is a lot of disparity and lots of laws and regulations still on the books to be dealt with.

I don't blame the NAACP for using their 1st amendment right to speak up about Robertson's clearly racist and revisionist comments.
 
...yes, and as you proved yesterday, because,...well, because you said so.
 
Robertson and Sharpton. What a contrast. Is Robertson ordained, or does he just an evangelist? Sharpton IS a reverend.

So you have Sharpton's brand of religion fighting for civil rights, and Robertson saying black people were happy without those rights.

What a contrast indeed.
 
Still nothing.


...well, lemme see,

1. you asked for proof of something I stated and I provided it.

2. Rick, and others asked you for proof of some of your accusations, and you failed to provide it.

3. you failed miserably.
 
...well, lemme see,

1. you asked for proof of something I stated and I provided it.

2. Rick, and others asked you for proof of some of your accusations, and you failed to provide it.

3. you failed miserably.

You're dreaming.

The guys who made sense in this thread were basically shouted out of the thread, accused of faking screen names, etc.

Not only did I offer proof, but several others did.

But there can be no proof if you say all the facts aren't facts. Denial is foolish.
 
...and you're a liar.

...you offered NO proof...when asked again and again for actual quotes, you failed to do so. Sorry but opinions are not "proof"...learn the word.

...you also asked for proof from me...I provided it. (...you might want to revisit post # 100 to help you with your "selective memory")



...you were soundly thrashed and exposed as a tool in this thread...please, just get back to your mindless blog rants.
 
Last edited:
Proof of what? The facts and the morality were clearly on my side.
 
"They're full of murder, envy, strife, hatred. They are insolent, arrogant, god haters, they are heartless, they are faithless, they are senseless, they are ruthless, they invent ways of doing evil!"

How is this guy not a bigot? Imagine if someone said the same thing about some other minority group. It is shocking that he has defenders.

Right!
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fk5VmM4pRhM

Here is the clip. Go to around minutes 17 and 18. This guy is a disgrace. Anyone who defends him is just as big a disgrace.

As for the Cracker Barrel, what do you expect when their typical customer is a bigoted yokel? It is hypocritical that the same people calling for Martin Bashir to be fired are the ones who are defending a bigot.

Go around minutes 17 and 18. I dare you.
 
Robertson and Sharpton. What a contrast. Is Robertson ordained, or does he just an evangelist? Sharpton IS a reverend.

So you have Sharpton's brand of religion fighting for civil rights, and Robertson saying black people were happy without those rights.

What a contrast indeed.


Al Sharpton with his ONE SIDED rhetoric sets the civil rights movement back 30 years every time he opens his racist mouth. And most of the attention he gets is for race baiting every time a person of color is accused of something but no where in site when it comes from the other side. Now there is man known for using the race card at the drop of a hat. And more so then this guy Robertson deserves the label of bigot.
 
Al Sharpton with his ONE SIDED rhetoric sets the civil rights movement back 30 years every time he opens his racist mouth. And most of the attention he gets is for race baiting every time a person of color is accused of something but no where in site when it comes from the other side. Now there is man known for using the race card at the drop of a hat. And more so then this guy Robertson deserves the label of bigot.

You're confusing him with Farrakhan.

How about you come up with an example of where he's wrongfully stepped in or played the race card?

Not from a right wing opinion site, please.
 
Here you go. Sharpton defending Paula Deen. Would that count as "intervening for the other side?"

http://www.tmz.com/2013/06/24/reverend-al-sharpton-paula-deen-racism/

No confusion to Farrakhan (another clown) And if you think him defending Paula dean is the norm for him you've missed a lot.

And c'mon seriously Denny what do you think the moron is doing every time he has a protest or a march of some sought when there's a white on black crime but no where to be seen when its in reverse. Is he visiting the white cops in the hospitals or consoling the families when there attacked by blacks? Or black on white crimes to civilians.

Please Denny lets not play games, I'd like to think you're above defending this jerk when you should really know better.
 
Proof of what? The facts and the morality were clearly on my side.


..."proof of what?"....lol...now you've once again down shifted to the coy/playing dumb mode again.

...go back and read what was said, dumbass....again, for example, revisit post #100.
 
Last edited:
/
.
.
...the Duke Lacrosse players, for one, are still waiting for an apology they'll never receive.


"The politically correct crowd is tolerant of all viewpoints, except those they disagree with."


599493_10150932158595448_174864221_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
Denny you may want to re-read your post on page 3 #62 where you VERY CLEARLY said, "Only a racist would say that black people were happy picking cotton,drinking from seperate water fountains, sitting in the back of buses & getting there food from the rear entrances of restaurants.

I asked on at least 3 different posts for you to show me where Robertson said all those things & you've still not shown me. The cotton fields he only described what he saw & perceived to be at that time. All the other shit he never said. You made it up.
 
No confusion to Farrakhan (another clown) And if you think him defending Paula dean is the norm for him you've missed a lot.

And c'mon seriously Denny what do you think the moron is doing every time he has a protest or a march of some sought when there's a white on black crime but no where to be seen when its in reverse. Is he visiting the white cops in the hospitals or consoling the families when there attacked by blacks? Or black on white crimes to civilians.

Please Denny lets not play games, I'd like to think you're above defending this jerk when you should really know better.

I am not in the position to speak for black Americans, but this guy is and does:

http://www.singleblackmale.org/2012...reverse-racism-and-why-al-sharpton-wont-stfu/

That said, I understand perfectly well why Al Sharpton speaks on the select occasions he chooses to speak out. It goes largely unspoken but we all know why.

Al Sharpton speaks because if he didn’t, who would?

(That's my understanding, and a fine reason to let him do his thing. Please answer the question in bold font.)
 
Denny you may want to re-read your post on page 3 #62 where you VERY CLEARLY said, "Only a racist would say that black people were happy picking cotton,drinking from seperate water fountains, sitting in the back of buses & getting there food from the rear entrances of restaurants.

I asked on at least 3 different posts for you to show me where Robertson said all those things & you've still not shown me. The cotton fields he only described what he saw & perceived to be at that time. All the other shit he never said. You made it up.


...^^^lol, yeah, I asked him earlier about that too, rick...and he staunchly insisted he did back up his claims, although it was abundantly clear that he did not.

...as we speak, I can see him frantically searching the web for more things to copy and paste more drivel that only muddies the water even more than he already has.

======================

...edit; ...lol...^^^ just as I predicted.
 
Last edited:
Denny you may want to re-read your post on page 3 #62 where you VERY CLEARLY said, "Only a racist would say that black people were happy picking cotton,drinking from seperate water fountains, sitting in the back of buses & getting there food from the rear entrances of restaurants.

I asked on at least 3 different posts for you to show me where Robertson said all those things & you've still not shown me. The cotton fields he only described what he saw & perceived to be at that time. All the other shit he never said. You made it up.

There's only so many ways I can order the words. You ignore them and deny I wrote them.

I answered you each and every time. One post even had two photos in it.

I'm not the only guy in this thread who saw his clearly racist remarks.
 
Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the blues.

No, they were not happy. The guy is painting some rosy picture of the south that somehow it was OK the way it was. It wasn't.

If he had said, "I wish it were like it was in 1850 for black people in the South, they were happy then" you would be defending him because he didn't outright say slavery.

Indefensible.

I won't bother to rearrange the word with hope you'll comprehend them.
 
There's only so many ways I can order the words. You ignore them and deny I wrote them.

I answered you each and every time. One post even had two photos in it.

I'm not the only guy in this thread who saw his clearly racist remarks.

Denny just this once one more time lets assume I'm from Missouri, show me where he makes the statement about the water fountains, buses, & restaurants. Yes pictures show me that those situations happened at one time but they don't show me where Robertson himself said those things. So again, I'll wait.
 
...^^^lol, yeah, I asked him earlier about that too, rick...and he staunchly insisted he did back up his claims, although it was abundantly clear that he did not.

...as we speak, I can see him frantically searching the web for more things to copy and paste more drivel that only muddies the water even more than he already has.

======================

...edit; ...lol...^^^ just as I predicted.

Lol, you don't understand what I write, maybe you'll grok what somebody else does.
 
There's only so many ways I can order the words. You ignore them and deny I wrote them.

I answered you each and every time. One post even had two photos in it.

I'm not the only guy in this thread who saw his clearly racist remarks.



...will you just give it a rest with that same lame response...instead of just saying you addressed something, how about you actually showing it for once.

...you're full of crap.
 
Denny just this once one more time lets assume I'm from Missouri, show me where he makes the statement about the water fountains, buses, & restaurants. Yes pictures show me that those situations happened at one time but they don't show me where Robertson himself said those things. So again, I'll wait.

Let's try a different tack. Without civil rights movement, all the black people we all know would be happy?

Tell me your version of what it would be like.

The guy said black people were happy without all that. The photos prove they weren't.
 
Lol, you don't understand what I write, maybe you'll grok what somebody else does.



...oh, I fully understand your drivel and your game...I'm simply dismissing it for lack of proof.

...you expel so much energy, typing so many words, while saying so little.
 
...will you just give it a rest with that same lame response...instead of just saying you addressed something, how about you actually showing it for once.

...you're full of crap.

When the facts aren't on your side, insult your opponent. Old trick.

The facts aren't on your side. Your defense of his bigotry and racism are outright pathetic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top