As one of those so-called "baggers" (and that term is a pejorative, FTW), I don't really have a problem with Romney. If he received the GOP nomination, I'd support him over Obama or a third-party candidate.
I wonder if your fellow baggers see it that way. I mean, he's Mormon, was gov of a deeply liberal state, is a moderate at best and I believe he will lose support of the far right and reformers.
Why do you keep typing "baggers" when I told you we consider it to be an insult? Do you wish to gargle testicles? Do you go to bed at night dreaming of pubic hair caught in your teeth? Clearly you're trying to keep yourself in the closet, but you just can't help yourself in busting out. I'm flattered, but I don't swing that way. One of the beauties of the Tea Party is that everyone speaks for themselves. That being said, the sentiments I've heard is that job #1 is to keep Obama from getting another four years. Romney is a smart guy who managed to get elected as a Mormon in Massachusetts. He understands the needs of the private sector and how to drive private sector growth better than any other candidate. People coalesce around the Tea Party because of its embrace of the 10th Amendment and a limited Federal Government. Many are social conservatives, but most seem to believe those issues are best solved at the state, and not federal, level. Thanks for demonstrating your ignorance and latent homosexuality, though. Keep reaching for that rainbow!
Many of those undecided may dislike Obama and not want to vote for him; but they could dislike the republican nominee even more and vote for Obama as the lesser of two evils.
Now, now, don't get your panties in a bunch. I mean no harm or insult. If I have offended you I really don't apologize, but didn't intend any harm.
I wonder. Obama has taken the country on a specific direction. Very specific. I think many independents trusted him, but feel their trust was abused. I'd be surprised if he retains even 50% of the swing voters he had last election.
Obama's decrease in the polls is coming from liberals. He has not reversed Bushism as he was elected to. He has not prosecuted torturers, not fought the 10-year tax cut that caused all our economic problems, and not quickly ended the wars. latest CNN poll http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.co...al-support-pushes-obama-approval-rating-down/ We might as well have a Republican president to emcee the nation's unstoppable destruction at the hands of Republicans. Why should we Democrats take the blame? I'm voting for a Republican president.
No offense taken, but you're as dense as a matzah ball. You're also demonstrating how little you understand. Perhaps a little more learning and a little less posting would be in order.
Hmm... I've been accused of that before... Cheap shot. I know a hell of a lot more than you will ever know. I don't post it because this is a freaking message board. I come here for comic relief, Maxie.
Yes, the giant tax cut for the rich caused all of our economic problems. Clinton's giant surplus ended not with 9/11, but before that when the tax cut was enacted. Before 9/11 is when the budget estimates completely went down the drain for future years. Probably, no one read my article, so I'll excerpt it.
what are you trying to say, that he is gay? what the fuck does that have to do with yall teabaggers? i dont get it i guess...if someone calls tea party members teabaggers, than they are gay? really? unreal man
