But you buy what they say, hook, line, and sinker. YOU refuse to refute what they say, even when it supports what I'm writing about.
I can't even begin to understand how this is an issue. Logically anything you say that CNN backs up should have one reaction from Dviss..... you're right for once Denny.
That's like an oxymoron. You said CNN is a fine news source. It's 24/7 spewing hate. A bunch of sore losers and crybabies.
False equivalence. Just because I consider them a solid source doesn't mean I "swallow everything they say". I scrutinize every piece of info that comes before me.
nope...quite serious...I know a lot of folks who didn't vote for him and have no designs on overthrowing the govt....there....clear now? Maybe you don't understand the term knowing people...
these are your standard, full of shit assumptions about how people come to their own conclusions....you don't know what anyone buys or trusts or doesn't trust...those labels are divisive...just like your orange guy...dviss probably buys no news feed hook line and sinker....a bit of respect might make these discussions a bit more interesting. doesn't need to be a ping pong match over every view that disagrees with your take on the world
Those are the ones that don't wear black clothes and masks and carry clubs. Fine people on all sides.
He _has_ to be buying it, like I said, if he thinks they're a good and trustworthy news source. I'm skeptical of any source that's biased, especially ones that show as much as CNN does. That goes for Fox News, too.
Nobody I know wears uniforms to rallies..or carry's weapons to public events..sorry to disappoint you
From what I know/read, many politicians on both sides of the spectrum feel Jackson was as crazy as Aaron Burr. Or vice versa.
I didn't hear you complaining about CNN until your orange, fat pile of crap became president. When did you start hating on CNN? You just used a link fucking TODAY...
Virtually EVERY person who appears on CNN, their own employees or talking heads, do want to overthrow the election. They constantly say so. They sound like you. The rhetoric is virtually the same.
What is with you and this idiotic analogy? Here's one that actually works. Here's Dviss logic in action. Bodyman isn't religious and doesn't believe everything in the bible. Bodyman has an argument with a Christian and uses bible quotes against the Christian. The Christian (according to Dviss) gets to say "You said you the bible is fake, you can't quote it"
You can't refute that link, can you? It's not like a Breitbart link that you'd dismiss without considering any validity to the content (which is a HUGE mistake). I complain about CNN because they are doing what they're doing. They've stopped being journalists and have become 24/7 whining crybabies with the most ridiculous conspiracy theories getting absurd attention.
