OT: Kings appealing loss to Grizzlies

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by PtldPlatypus, Nov 18, 2014.

  1. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,686
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's basically where I come out on this one. With things like games that might have been tied, or calls earlier in the game, or even possession or fouls near the end, the way events might have played out had the call gone the other way is indeterminate. But when we're talking about a last second shot where a team goes from behind to ahead, there are no other extenuating circumstances to consider. Either the shot was valid and they win, or it was invalid and they lose.
     
  2. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The problem is it's NEVER the last play. The refs fuck up so much in a game, to be fair you'd have to analyze the whole game in slow motion. But it does really look like the ball was tipped.

    The league may issue an apology, they've done that several times, but they never over-turn the results of game.
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2014
  3. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong...the refs start the clock.
     
  4. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We've been fucked over many times, including being fucked out of a championship...so why should the Kings get this?
     
  5. noknobs

    noknobs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    4,911
    Likes Received:
    6,292
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Completely agree. If those weren't the exact circumstances then I'd be much more worried about the precedent of overturning the outcome of a game, but in this particular case I think it's the right thing to do. In a way, not overturning it is a more worrying precedent to set. It's basically saying, even if you have great evidence re: the last and deciding play of the game, we aren't going to make it right.
     
  6. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It wouldn't be setting any precedent. That precedent has been set a long time ago.
     
  7. noknobs

    noknobs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    4,911
    Likes Received:
    6,292
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're probably right, in which case we need to break this cycle of abuse.

    I don't know so I'm asking, what other instances have there been (in the replay era) where there is clear evidence that the last and deciding play of the game was ruled incorrectly? I'm not talking about judgment calls, like fouls.
     
  8. BlazerWookee

    BlazerWookee UNTILT THE DAMN PINWHEEL!

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    13,193
    Likes Received:
    6,533
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Gear Finisher
    Location:
    Lebanon, Oregon
    I don't see how a loss to the Grizzlies could ever be described as "appealing..."
     
  9. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I would love for them to overturn the results because it benefits, but what dangerous web will it spin
     
  10. THE HCP

    THE HCP NorthEastPortland'sFinest

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    71,332
    Likes Received:
    60,016
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    N.E.P.
    Do you apply all this anger towards every other aspect of your life? You are the type of person who could be drowning and somebody saves your life by throwing you a life preserver......then you would complain about the color. #lightenUpFAMS
     
  11. HomerLovesKoolAid

    HomerLovesKoolAid I have a well-known member.

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,352
    Likes Received:
    7,513
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're way out of line here HCP. No one would throw him a life preserver.
     
  12. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This has happened dozens of times a year since sports have been televised. There are obvious bad calls every game. You can't only look at the last play. But as a few examples, remember the LA block that they called a goaltend that cost us the game against OKC, or when Portland had 6 men on the court against Boston and won by a point?
     
  13. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, I'm a angry person....grrrrrr.
     
  14. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This current system is flawed, because they only review things within the last two minutes, but the plays that take place in the middle of the quarter are just as important. Coaches should be able to have a couple of challenges, with officials being able to call a review in the last 2 minutes.

    Like remember the game where the refs screwed Portland out of a couple of out of bounds calls, then in the last two minutes, a call was reviewed, and it went against Portland. So in that case it just made the end result even more unfair.
     
  15. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,686
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually, we can look at only the last play, because that's the only play that doesn't have any subsequent plays that would be affected by such a review. That's what makes this a special case, and makes it a candidate for a precedent-setting decision.
     
  16. PDXFonz

    PDXFonz I’m listening

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    19,925
    Likes Received:
    16,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Should make this a poll so the lurkers can weigh in.

    Whether or not people think calls like this should be reversed.


    I think it's a bad idea.
     
  17. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,016
    Likes Received:
    57,155
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I wouldn't reverse the call. Improve the replay system. Give coaches a challenge like in football. You could literally go back through and analyze an entire game and find one or two things that could change the outcome. It's pandora's box and it should stay closed.
     

Share This Page