OT: Kobe vs Jordan?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by KingSpeed, Jun 2, 2010.

  1. Mr.Gunner

    Mr.Gunner Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Messages:
    491
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I disagree, Pippen was just a better player than Pau, he ran the show when Jordan was out injured. With a rebounder as Rodman they did not really need to rely on a big man to lead them, Pippen, Jodan, Kukoc, Harper, could easily hit from the outside, Luc longley wasn't that bad as a center. IMO Jordan had alot more talent around him than kobe has.
     
  2. handiman

    handiman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,881
    Likes Received:
    3,916
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He would have said the same thing about LeBron if that's who had just beaten him. Most coaches play it safe with that sort of bulletin board material.
     
  3. huevonkiller

    huevonkiller Change (Deftones)

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    25,798
    Likes Received:
    90
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Student.
    Location:
    Miami, Florida
    No I was just mentioning a good player, not equating him to Shaq.
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2010
  4. KingSpeed

    KingSpeed Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    62,947
    Likes Received:
    22,140
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    actor
    Location:
    New York
    Interesting stat:

    Kobe has played 15 more playoff games than MJ did and yet...

    30+ point games in playoffs:

    Jordan 109
    Kobe 76
     
  5. KingSpeed

    KingSpeed Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    62,947
    Likes Received:
    22,140
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    actor
    Location:
    New York
    Ugh. Listen. Pippen was awesome, but he and MJ had NO OFFENSIVE POST PLAYER to throw the ball to. Kobe has had Shaq and Pau. It is nearly impossible to win in the playoffs without a scorer in the post. Pippen and MJ did it six times!!!! Pau makes Kobe's job soooo much easier.
     
  6. Sex Panther

    Sex Panther works every time.

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2004
    Messages:
    5,528
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Ask.
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    Pippen >> Pau
    Jordan >>>> Kobe.

    That seems about right.
     
  7. 44Thrilla

    44Thrilla cuatro cuatro

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    14,113
    Likes Received:
    216
    Trophy Points:
    63
    OK, good. Grant and Rodman were great role players. Shaq was unstoppable for like 5 years.
     
  8. huevonkiller

    huevonkiller Change (Deftones)

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    25,798
    Likes Received:
    90
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Student.
    Location:
    Miami, Florida
    That was never a debate, for me.

    Grant and Pau are a little underrated here.
     
  9. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,976
    Likes Received:
    10,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    The problem for the Bulls with Grant is that how he went, so did the Bulls. They beat Phoenix in a close game in the finals in a game where Grant was terrible. He had an uncontested dunk to tie the game with time running out and didn't even want to take that shot. The game wouldn't have been that close if he had a reasonably good game, let alone his typical game.

    For that reason, I think the Bulls let him walk. You can't be as good as your 3rd best player.
     
  10. huevonkiller

    huevonkiller Change (Deftones)

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    25,798
    Likes Received:
    90
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Student.
    Location:
    Miami, Florida
    He had contract demands I thought.

    The Magic were willing to pay him 14+ million a year.
     
  11. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,976
    Likes Received:
    10,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    I think they'd have paid him if they thought he was more consistent. After Jordan retired the first time, the Bulls didn't win with him. Easy enough to lose without him, so the saying goes.

    Anyhow, according to basketball-reference.com, his salary with the Magic was $2.1M the first two seasons, or $200K more than he made with the Bulls.

    And this article says he signed his big contract after 2 years with the Magic:

    http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-15869587.html

    And this article says the Bulls offered him $4M/year and rescinded the offer forcing Grant to leave.

    http://www.nytimes.com/1994/07/30/s...-leaves-the-bulls-to-help-solidify-magic.html

    It also states the Bulls felt he cost them a championship without Jordan that season:

     
  12. bbwtrench

    bbwtrench BBW Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Messages:
    5,425
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I just wanted to point out that MVP trophy's are sh*t. NASH = 2 back to back. NO TITLES.. LEBRON = 2 back to back. NO TITLES. The MVP trophy is a joke. The real TROPHY comes when the FINALS ARE WON. KOBE > LEBRON and NASH. Everyone talks about SHAQ and GASOL helping KOBE without giving any credit to SCOTTIE PIPPEN. The man was all star talent. He is listed as one of the NBA's 50 greatest players. Without Scottie would Jordan have WON 6? Its highly debatable.
     
  13. VanillaGorilla

    VanillaGorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,073
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When talking about who is the greatest player of all time, I do not think it is right to consider NBA titles. MVP isn't that great but it is better. I think it is absolute bullshit when people say if they were that good they would have won titles. One player cannot win titles. and arguing about supporting cast is incredibly subjective. I know I'm in the very small minority with that opinion but it is just how I think.
     
  14. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    I agree completely. Winning (games and championships) is the ultimate measure of teams, not individuals. Individuals can only do their best to help their teams win...if the rest of their team isn't good enough, even the best individual contributions won't be sufficient.
     
  15. Mr.Gunner

    Mr.Gunner Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Messages:
    491
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Agreed 100%
     
  16. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Pippen was a GREAT player. But to compare him to Shaq (while on the Lakers) isn't reasonable. Shaq absolutely terrorized teams, and completely dominated games.

    IMO, as far as most dominant player ever: Shaq is above Kobe, let alone Pippen.
     
  17. MrSelfDestruct

    MrSelfDestruct Louie, Louie, Louie

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2009
    Messages:
    945
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    Buying
    Location:
    Sammamish, WA
    I know PER doesn't tell the whole story, so don't bother stating that. I am however going to use it as a metric to those saying Jordan's supporting cast was better.

    Code:
    Playoff PER
    
    Jordan:                Pippen:             
    90-91-  32.0         90-91-  22.0                 
    91-92-  27.2         91-92-  20.1
    92-93-  30.1         92-93-  16.9   
    95-96-  26.7         95-96-  19.4
    96-97-  27.1         96-97-  18.1
    97-98-  28.1         97-98-  19.5
    
    
    Bryant:                 O'Neal:               Gasol:
    99-00-  19.3         99-00-  30.5
    00-01-  25.0         00-01-  28.7  
    01-02-  20.5         01-02-  28.3
    08-09-  26.8                                 08-09-  21.9
    09-10-  25.3                                 09-10-  24.1
    
    Like I said, PER doesn't tell the whole story, but it's interesting to me to see the parity between the two players. Kobe's best championship year is basically equal to Jordan's worst championship year. Also, Kobe has had significantly more help than Jordan ever received from their respective cohorts.

    If you're wondering why I'm only using playoff PER, it's because the conversation turned towards championships and playoffs. However, regular season is actually pretty similar. Also, I included this season for a larger sample size.
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2010
  18. huevonkiller

    huevonkiller Change (Deftones)

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    25,798
    Likes Received:
    90
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Occupation:
    Student.
    Location:
    Miami, Florida
    The factors PER misses are durability, usage rate, assisted bucket %, and defense. Generally I'd rather go with Win Shares and it seems to correlate much better with greatness (for the modern era, missing numbers complicate things before Magic's time).

    Since the post-season is a bit longer now, I would also suggest WS/48. Jordan struggled in two of his title runs (for his standards), because he had some usage rate problems and adjusting for teammates, he didn't ALWAYS come out on top of Kobe. Kobe was at about .24 WS/48, beating MJ two of those titles. LeBron was all-time historic in the 09 playoffs, so he deserves credit as well. Now of course, MJ had two other non-title years where he played better than Bryant. Shaq was a dominant player but Kobe almost had two outliers in the playoffs, which brought his dominance to a similar level in his prime.

    Pau Gasol is also being underrated because his defense has improved (Dwight Howard had a better series against Boston this year than against Pau last year), and he works well without an exorbitant amount of touches. I would say some of Grant's/etc. abilities and contributions are being solely attributed to Pippen. Just some nuances I wanted to take into account.
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2010
    Sex Panther likes this.
  19. CelticKing

    CelticKing The Green Monster

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    15,334
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Shaqachusetts
    It's safe to say that without Pau Gasol, Lakers wouldn't have won last year's championship, and we could say same for this year, (haven't won it yet, but 3 games wins away from doing it). Isn't Pau considered as best big post player in the league right now? So was Shaq during the 3 rings they got together. What happened when he left? Did LA win anything?

    Plus when talking about Grant, Rodman, etc, remember Kobe has had Horry, Fisher, etc. (role players who played big for their championships)


    Then remember all the great teams MJ and Bulls had to beat to get to the Finals, year after year. HOFers like Barkley, Ewing, Stockton, etc etc, didn't get any rings because of MJ. :)
     
  20. ehizzy3

    ehizzy3 RIP mgb

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    10,163
    Likes Received:
    6,339
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hillsboro/Bogotá
    all you kids are wrong.
     

Share This Page