OT Nets ranked 6th by.....

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Arrpy)</div><div class='quotemain'>

The Raptors are rated 28th!</p>

Terrible... </p></div>

WTF?</p>

The Raptors in 28th?</p>

That's retarded.</p>

We're one point under the Spurs.</p>

Yeah. Okay.</p>
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CelticKing)</div><div class='quotemain'>The game looks sick.</div>

</p> is that a good sick or bad sick?
 
Why are the rating so horrible?? How can the Raptors go from top 3 team in the East last season to bottom 3 in the entire league? Doesnt matter cause I wont be getting Live anyways, I have switched boats 2 years ago to 2k and havent looked back.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (peg182)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CelticKing)</div><div class='quotemain'>The game looks sick.</div>

</p>

is that a good sick or bad sick?</div></p>

good sick. as in cool.
wink.gif
</p>

</p>
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CelticKing)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (peg182)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CelticKing)</div><div class='quotemain'>The game looks sick.</div>

</p>

is that a good sick or bad sick?</div></p>

good sick. as in cool.
wink.gif
</p>

</p> </div>

</p>

word. i still don't get why there's all the Live haters out there. </p>

2k is so hard to play, the player movements and the defense is so...strange.</p>
 
NBA Live games are terrible.</p>

NBA 2K games are sooooo much better.</p>

</p>
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Arrpy)</div><div class='quotemain'>

NBA Live games are terrible.</p>

NBA 2K games are sooooo much better.</p>

</p></div>

</p> okay, explain how the non-existent defense and weird graphics are better than what nba live has to offer.
 
So I guess everyone will agree that Jason Kidd is the 8th best PG in the NBA.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (peg182)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Arrpy)</div><div class='quotemain'>

NBA Live games are terrible.</p>

NBA 2K games are sooooo much better.</p>

</p></div>

</p>

okay, explain how the non-existent defense and weird graphics are better than what nba live has to offer.</div></p>

2K games for PS2 have no defence at all. But 2K games for PS3 And 360 have tons of defence.</p>

And there isn't weird graphics...</p>

</p>
 
I think Live took a ranking of each position player on the roster and ranked them then gave them a rating based on players of similar positions....then somehow consolidated that. VC, RJ and Kidd are top ranked players at their positions. The surprising thing is how Boston with KG, Pierce and Allen are below us.
 
I hope it's true that we are 6th in the NBA
 
[quote name='peg182'][quote name='CelticKing'][quote name='peg182'][quote name='CelticKing']The game looks sick.[/QUOTE]

</p>

is that a good sick or bad sick?[/QUOTE]</p>

good sick. as in cool.
wink.gif
</p>

</p> [/QUOTE]

</p>

word. i still don't get why there's all the Live haters out there. </p>

2k is so hard to play, the player movements and the defense is so...strange. </p>[/QUOTE]

If you are a true basketball fan who is looking for realism in their basketball game then you have to appreciate what NBA 2K brings to the table with fluid animations and great gameplay. IMO I dont think I will be able to play another Live game during this console generation because EA is really looking hopeless, it is like none of their producers ever watched a basketball game. Anyways not trying to convince you but if you are looking for simulation basketball then 2K is for you, on the other hand if you feel like throwing down some amazing dunks with a more arcady feel to it then play Live. </p>
 
I think live and 2K will have good ratings for the Nets due to the strength of starters, I think they heavily influence the overall ratings.</p>

-Petey </p>
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jarkid)</div><div class='quotemain'>I hope it's true that we are 6th in the NBA</div>

</p>

No way, I don't think you're even top 6 in the East, on paper your team is beastly but Lawrence Franks is one of the worst offensive coaches in the league and depth wise your team is very lacking. You still have a HoF PG and two great scorers but even with them this squad continuesely under-achieves. Here are the teams I would consider better than you in no order: </p>

</p>

1. Suns</p>

2. Mavericks</p>

3. Spurs</p>

4. Rockets</p>

5. Bulls</p>

6. Celtics</p>

7. Jazz</p>

8. Nuggets</p>

9. Pistons</p>

10. Cavaliers</p>

11. Wizards</p>

12. Heat</p>

13. Raptors</p>

</p>

There are other teams such as the Magic whom I consider equal to the Nets.</p>

</p>
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GArenas)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jarkid)</div><div class='quotemain'>I hope it's true that we are 6th in the NBA</div>

</p>

No way, I don't think you're even top 6 in the East, on paper your team is beastly but Lawrence Franks is one of the worst offensive coaches in the league and depth wise your team is very lacking. You still have a HoF PG and two great scorers but even with them this squad continuesely under-achieves. Here are the teams I would consider better than you in no order: </p>

</p>

1. Suns</p>

2. Mavericks</p>

3. Spurs</p>

4. Rockets</p>

5. Bulls</p>

6. Celtics</p>

7. Jazz</p>

8. Nuggets</p>

9. Pistons</p>

10. Cavaliers</p>

11. Wizards</p>

12. Heat</p>

13. Raptors</p>

</p>

There are other teams such as the Magic whom I consider equal to the Nets. </p>

</p>

</div></p>

I was agreeing with your entire post untill I saw you had ranked your Wizards 11th in the league.</p>

</p>
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Arrpy)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (peg182)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Arrpy)</div><div class='quotemain'>

NBA Live games are terrible.</p>

NBA 2K games are sooooo much better.</p>

</p></div>

</p>

okay, explain how the non-existent defense and weird graphics are better than what nba live has to offer.</div></p>

2K games for PS2 have no defence at all. But 2K games for PS3 And 360 have tons of defence.</p>

And there isn't weird graphics... </p>

</p> </div>

</p> oh...i guess that explains it, then. never played 2k for ps3 and 360. Thanks.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GArenas)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jarkid)</div><div class='quotemain'>I hope it's true that we are 6th in the NBA</div>

</p>

No way, I don't think you're even top 6 in the East, on paper your team is beastly but Lawrence Franks is one of the worst offensive coaches in the league and depth wise your team is very lacking. You still have a HoF PG and two great scorers but even with them this squad continuesely under-achieves. Here are the teams I would consider better than you in no order: </p>

</p>

1. Suns</p>

2. Mavericks</p>

3. Spurs</p>

4. Rockets</p>

5. Bulls</p>

6. Celtics</p>

7. Jazz</p>

8. Nuggets</p>

9. Pistons</p>

10. Cavaliers</p>

11. Wizards</p>

12. Heat</p>

13. Raptors</p>

</p>

There are other teams such as the Magic whom I consider equal to the Nets. </p>

</p>

</div></p>

I was agreeing with your entire post untill I saw you had ranked your Wizards 11th in the league. </p>

</p>

</div></p>

</p>

First of all, this is in no particular order as I said in my post. Secondly, I don't see why Washington can't be that high, we led the Eastern Conference last year and were beating teams like Dallas, Phoenix, and Utah until injuries struck. After January, Jamison was out for 3 weeks, there was one week with the big three healthy then Caron Butler went out for 2 weeks, just to return and then break his hand and miss the rest of the season, three days after Caron Butler's injury: Gilbert Arenas goes down with a season ending leg injury. Now we're a deeper team and are starting off the season with our full roster.</p>

</p>
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top