Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by e_blazer, Dec 1, 2017.
That you would never be able to satisfy her, even if she were willing to give you the time of day?
Alright so that didn’t really turn out like I thought..........
I know you like to play Devil's Advocate, but you should really stop defending him.
I don't know what happens on twitter, because I don't have a twitter account.
But if I'm currently logged into s2, I will get an alert at the bottom of the screen if someone tags/likes/quotes/posts after a post I made.
Also there is an 'alert' tab that shows you stuff stuff as well near your user name at the top of the website.
Ya, I see the alerts for LIKES (because I receive so many of them).....but nothing for tagging. I’ll check my settings.
Fixed....tag away FAMS! @HCP
Ok, I'll tell you want the word was:
The word was $#%#@@@
Eh. He's young. He'll understand later. Now go get that free education!!!
If that were true, then I'd hypothetically have license to say the word that RipCity imagined in his mind that I said.
lol. You don't know WHO JetBlack is.
Hope he still comes to Oregon. It's damn sure he's not following Taggart to FSU, so that at least would be some consolation.
Troy is gonna be a JR, it's his brother Travis that is incoming here.
Me either. I thought it was an iPhone color choice.
Sorry. I'm out of the loop
Thanks for the clarification.
Wouldn't that be ironic if I am Jetblack.
That would actually make me really happy. I worried about Jet. Very angry person.
Not only is it reasonable, but its human nature.
Paths dont just "divert" when they have a history.
Patterns are everywhere man. including behavior. Patterns are repetitive, and thus easily predicted and seen.
Thats kind of like saying its unreasonable to think that a sports fan would only like one sport.
There ARE sports fans who only like one sport, but that isnt the norm and most would assume sports fans like multiple sports.
What you are doing now is enabling those who try to push their views to the edge through passive aggressive behavior.
There are people who are smart enough(even within thier fucked up racists or prejudiced views) that love to try twist things through vagueness and then play the innocent card.
When a person has history of making racial statements and then plays this vague card, it is absolutely reasonable and natural to assume its just another racial statement.
I think you are giving humans too much credit. We dont forgive and forget so easily and we remember patterns and we associate based off of them.
So when someone has a historical pattern, you better believe it is reasonable to assume they are continuing on that path.
Furthermore, I think it would be UNreasonable to think otherwise.
Now is this right? Maybe, maybe not. But you said reasonable... not right.
Separate names with a comma.