Re: PFF's statement in sig ^Obviously, mine was the 2nd post. But my point is how he is ruining the team from a playing standpoint. He wasn't getting a lot of time and was not a factor. I mean you might as well as add McLeod too.
Re: PFF's statement in sig <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CB4AllStar @ Feb 11 2007, 05:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>No, it's probably around 60-70%...</div>I highly doubt it's even that high, I would be willing to bet it's around 15-20%.
Re: PFF's statement in sig It depends. If it is 16-18 year olds than it is definately higher than 15-20%. Atleast where I live....Halifax is the drug and crime capital of Canada...
Re: PFF's statement in sig <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">There's no possible way for such a percentage to exist when concerning smoking about any group, unless it states:<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>98% of potsmokers have tried to smoke. 2% have tried to smoke as well. Post this in your sig if you're that 2%.</div></span>
Re: PFF's statement in sig <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CB4AllStar @ Feb 12 2007, 10:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>It depends. If it is 16-18 year olds than it is definately higher than 15-20%. Atleast where I live....Halifax is the drug and crime capital of Canada...</div>So it is equal to Montana's drug and crime rates? Just kidding I know you will go crazy. It does depend on the age group though. 13 - 15 is probably much less than 16 - 18.
Re: PFF's statement in sig <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Camby23Land @ Feb 13 2007, 11:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>So it is equal to Montana's drug and crime rates? Just kidding I know you will go crazy. It does depend on the age group though. 13 - 15 is probably much less than 16 - 18.</div>
