Plasma help

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by maxiep, Aug 12, 2009.

  1. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
  2. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    My understanding is that sports programming doesn't compress well, so they would require a lot of satellite or cable bandwidth at 1080 resolution. Video with near static backgrounds compress the best - like TV news with only the reporter's head moving and a static blue screen image in the background. The background for sports programming pans across the fans in the seats.
     
  3. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,057
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    so are you saying, we get 1080 here because the signal doesn't go as far? but not 1080 in other arenas because they are further? i don't mean to sound rude, just confused on your exact point other than, 1080 sports is hard.
     
  4. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    You may not be getting 1080 for sports at all.

    It has nothing to do with distance, but with mpeg compression ratios.

    480 takes 4 megabits / second of bandwidth.

    720 takes 12 to 15 megabits.

    1080 takes 15 to 28 megabits (and toward the 28 MBit/sec for sports).

    There's not an unlimited amount of bandwidth in a cable system or on a satellite.

    Cable TV is currently FCC regulated so they can't use MPEG 4 compression, so they are stuck with MPEG 2. MPEG 4 is about 2x less bandwidth for the same quality programs.

    http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/services/2006-06-04-cable-hdtv_x.htm

    Cable operators find it tough to swallow HDTV

    NEW YORK — After years of dithering and infighting by government officials and corporate executives, the high-definition TV revolution is finally here.

    This year, for the first time, consumers will buy more HDTV sets than traditional ones. Morgan Stanley estimates that nearly 26% of households will enjoy HD's gee-whiz video and theater sound by year's end and that 67.6% will in 2010, thanks to prices falling from today's $1,000 and up.

    That's good news for the TV industry, right?

    Maybe not for cable operators.

    Their wires are so packed with TV channels and new services — including video on demand (VOD), broadband Internet and phone — that many are scrambling to find bandwidth for the coming wave of HD channels. "Cable operators need massive capacity for HDTV, and have to move quickly," says Sanford C. Bernstein's Craig Moffett. "HDTV is hot."

    (more at the link)
     

Share This Page