Notice in all that that Golliver knows what he's talking about when he recirculates reports from other reporters. Or when describing their reactions. Or when speculating. Not for any original, sourced information.
In his favor: Golliver is 2% as bad as either Canzano or Quick. He used to show signs of becoming 20% as bad as them. But that was a couple of years ago and he hasn't worsened as I expected. So maybe I'll lay off and just criticize individual articles instead of the totality of everything he does. This is a great gift from me to him, and I want 2 free tickets.
Tachos (a tater tots/nachos concoction) and grilled chicken salad. I played it safe with a bacon cheeseburger and side salad.
How about linking to the other thread in which you asked us what to ask him. I want to see what I said, so I can complain a lot.