Maybe while they were going through Ohio Ruben Patterson got released from Jail and they had a get together for old times sake!
Then why bring it up at all? Odds are, the "incident" was nothing of consequence....but the Canzano/Jaynes types will assume it means Roy was caught in bed with a live boy, a dead girl, and a really embarassed sheep.
Maybe Lamarcus Aldridge through the ball the full length of the court and nailed Jeff Pendergraph right in the gnards....
You aren't really part of the team. Quick wouldn't have been referring to you, because no one would care. It's like saying "Things happened" because a random person on the street outside the team hotel got into a fight.
Did you see him while peaking through the blinds? Was he talking to the next Blazers coack - Marc Iavaroni? Curious minds want to know. BNM
FREE IAVARONI!! He may not have been the task master we needed to deal with the knuckleheads we had back then, but how would Iavaroni do with this group?
Then why even allude to it! I despise this 'something happened but I can't tell' crap. My boss does that and it's fucking annoying. Don't leave people hanging. If you can tell, do. If you can't then be disciplined enough to not even refer to it. Otherwise you inspire digging and draw attention to it indirectly and in the end you may as well have told anyway. It's worm behavior and is why I can't stand Quick. Ok, just one reason of several but it's a big reason.
So Quick predicts Miller will be starting when the team plays Sacramento on Tuesday. I think everyone can see that. What's not funny to think about is if Blake is still starting and the Blazers go back to the 3 guard lineup, and not a Miller/Roy/Webster lineup. If this happens I'll lose it.
