Quick.... wizards most likely trading partner

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by MIXUM, Jan 14, 2010.

  1. Idog1976

    Idog1976 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,730
    Likes Received:
    3,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    I look to the stars.
    Location:
    P-Town baby!
    That's certainly interesting. Love the motor, and the nasty attitude would be great if he and Bayless could infect their teamates. That said, chemistry would be a pretty major question mark. I feel like the team has the 1 thru 3 pretty well locked up and actually needs to send a couple guys at those positions to other teams. It's the 4/5 that look shaky. Barring some kind of crazy Canzano wet dream move for LeBron I think our focus should be on a hard nosed defender/rebounder with a back to the basket game who has range on the baseline to 10 or 12 feet. Preferably a 4/5 swingman. Not sure who that would be any ideas?

    Untouchables: Roy, Batum, Oden (we wouldn't get even CLOSE to value for him due to injuries) and Bayless.

    Hard to pry from my grasp: Rudy, Martell.

    Trade bait: Miller, Blake, Outlaw and LMA (I know I've been dogging him but we SHOULD get value no Jamison trade *chuckle*)

    Two guys I think Blazers have to value more then other teams are Cunninghame and Pendergraph. I see real solid lunchpail guys for our bench in those two. on the CHEAP.
     
  2. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,716
    Likes Received:
    13,129
    Trophy Points:
    113
    NO chance of getting Noah. Our opportunity was probably a year and a half ago. But, most don't like to buy low, so at the time, it was easier to mock his stats and say he's ugly.
     
  3. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I would love to add more "nasty" to the team. But I agree with you. That is why I said I figured it wouldn't happen. Sometimes it is good to recognize guys who might fit your system, and dream a little.
     
  4. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why would the Bulls part with him though? But you're right he is kind of like the anti-LMA, he's got zero offensive game and is basically a hyper-athletic version of Joel Przybilla.
     
  5. hasoos

    hasoos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,418
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Please note the "And I don't think we can get" part of my sentence!:devilwink:
     
  6. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "Don't think" sort of implied to me, "maybe there's an outside chance" I guess -- which I see none.
     
  7. Kaydow

    Kaydow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Messages:
    2,057
    Likes Received:
    279
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Occupation:
    Construction Sales
    Location:
    Happy Valley
    Back to the title of the thread . . . aren't the Wizards everybody's most likely trading partner? Everyone assumes that with their payroll and win-loss record that they are in "dump" mode. I would guess there are several teams calling about Haywood, Butler, & Jamison.
     

Share This Page