Trade Idea Realistic trade options for summer of 2023

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by SharpeScooterShooter, Apr 11, 2023.

  1. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,741
    Likes Received:
    55,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    The Suns went and got Paul after building a solid young team with Booker, Ayton, Bridges. It's not comparable at all. They blew it up. They got a bunch of young guys. They added Paul later as a veteran presence.
     
    lamlor and AngryFan like this.
  2. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,741
    Likes Received:
    55,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    We don't have to keep those picks. And that's the same argument that people made about the Celtics trading Garnett/Pierce to Brooklyn..... and then Brooklyn was terrible and those picks were worth a ton.
     
    lamlor likes this.
  3. tykendo

    tykendo Don't Tread On PDX

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    7,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yah, we can trade those picks for a bunch of mediocre talent, then trade them for draft picks, and on and on.........
     
    Pinwheel1 likes this.
  4. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,741
    Likes Received:
    55,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Any chance we could bend NOP over a barrel? And then send out Valanciunas and Nance somewhere else.

    upload_2023-4-14_14-13-27.png
     
  5. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,741
    Likes Received:
    55,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    We traded a pick and a TPE for Jerami Grant. Do you think he's mediocre talent?
     
  6. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    22,668
    Likes Received:
    15,104
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I tend to agree with this. If the intent is to build a young team first and then use future picks to add a really good player to be a contender, I would rather use the picks we can offer now to find that same type of player while keeping Dame, SS, and Grant. If we can land a pick now in the 2-4 range...... that will probably be a higher draft pick than any contending team (that wants Dame) can give us. May 16th can't come soon enough.
     
    tykendo likes this.
  7. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,741
    Likes Received:
    55,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Yeah I just really want to know where our pick is. It's going to dictate so many things.
     
    lamlor likes this.
  8. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,577
    Likes Received:
    34,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    Watching Dame play is fun from a personal player standpoint but not necessarily from a team standpoint. So if we could get a haul and be better down the road than #5/#6 seed lottery picks in back to back years, versus watching Dame put up nice numbers while the team continues to not be a legit contender after being exactly that for the last 20+ years, that seems a pretty easy decision.

    Especially when at the end of watching Dame put up nice numbers with little to show for it from a team standpoint, there would be no assets coming back for him. Like Oden....like Roy.....like LA...like so many others.
     
  9. Samuel

    Samuel James “Hollywood” Robinson

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,911
    Likes Received:
    1,783
    Trophy Points:
    113
    where’s the dropoff, in your view?

    2? 4?
     
  10. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    67,841
    Likes Received:
    66,596
    Trophy Points:
    113
    With Mike Schmidt on the draft team I can see them trading down in the draft as part of a trade coupled with Ant's contract...you could still have a draft pick, just a lower one. and maybe net a Jaylen Brown or OG type player ..I think Schmidt is a real talent for team Cronin over the off season
     
    tykendo likes this.
  11. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,741
    Likes Received:
    55,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I’m not sure yet. I haven’t started digging into the mocks.
     
  12. James lamphear

    James lamphear Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2018
    Messages:
    7,881
    Likes Received:
    5,559
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wood got bench because he not a good defender yes he has some offense but trying to improve your defense wood wouldn't be the answer.
     
    UKRAINEFAN and RR7 like this.
  13. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,272
    Likes Received:
    26,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Neither would building around Dame, or keeping Ant, Sharpe or Chauncey
     
  14. James lamphear

    James lamphear Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2018
    Messages:
    7,881
    Likes Received:
    5,559
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your not going get Brown or OG for Simons. I believe if Simons gets traded he will become a 6th man type player due to his defense and the same thing that the Blazers needs to consider.
     
  15. James lamphear

    James lamphear Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2018
    Messages:
    7,881
    Likes Received:
    5,559
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Building around one player is totally nonsense.
     
    lamlor and Natebishop3 like this.
  16. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,272
    Likes Received:
    26,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree.
     
    Natebishop3 and James lamphear like this.
  17. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,702
    Likes Received:
    36,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    way too much of a stretched comparison

    when Garnett was traded to Brooklyn he was 37; Pierce was 36. That's 4-5 years older than Dame now. And the Nets had a dumbfuck Russian owner who kept the dumbfuck Billy King as GM. The same GM who essentially traded Lillard for Gerald Wallace.

    I'm not saying you're doing it, but I have seen it around here: I think using the winning side of extremely stupid trades like that KG/Pierce trade and the Gobert trade as a template for what Portland can accomplish in a Dame trade is loopy
     
  18. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    22,668
    Likes Received:
    15,104
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Probably not Brown, but I think Ant and a top 3 pick would get you OG. I just am not sure OG is worth that.
    I would much rather offer more to land Brown or Siakam. Or #23 and Ant for OG
     
  19. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    92,741
    Likes Received:
    55,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    OG is absolutely NOT worth that much. Not even close.
     
    lamlor likes this.
  20. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,461
    Likes Received:
    20,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    Oh, he'll be ready.
     

Share This Page