Replaceable Stars?

Discussion in 'NBA General' started by Something-To-Say, Nov 21, 2006.

  1. CelticBalla32

    CelticBalla32 Basketball is back in Boston

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,129
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BALLAHOLLIC? @ Nov 22 2006, 04:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Most people knew they would be contenders soon enough. It's obvious how bright the future was before Wallace arrived.Chicago Bulls: 3-8....</div>The Mavs started 0-3. Phoenix is 4-6 right now. Records in month 1 really don't prove anything. How about Orlando last year? They were not good all year long, then they went on a huge run at the end of the year, and just missed the playoffs. Runs always take place with good/solid teams (remember in 2005 when the Celtics traded for Walker again and the team won 11 of the next 12?). The Bulls will bounce back, so will Miami.
     
  2. BALLAHOLLIC

    BALLAHOLLIC Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    10,496
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I understand that, I'm just tying to say that most people knew Chicago would become contenders very soon. It was obvious how bright their future was.With or without Wallace Chicago would still be contenders very soon.
     

Share This Page