Republicans *almost* always filibustering

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by Eastoff, Apr 26, 2010.

  1. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,378
    Likes Received:
    12,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Works for them, too. Everyone gets paid for doing nothing. Wouldn't be too surprised if they were all just in on it together. Ok, we'll fillibuster, you try to pass crazy shit. Ok, nwo we're in power, we'll try to pass crazy shit, you fillibuster. Neither of us really do anything and we all get paid. Keep the status quo.
     
  2. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,040
    Likes Received:
    4,009
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    UPDATE! the senate has finally gotten the okay to start DISCUSSING the bill. Apparently the GOP cracked when they talked about all night sessions and the kentucky senators wanted to go watch the derby.
     
  3. STOMP

    STOMP mere fan

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    11,213
    Likes Received:
    3,808
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Marin
    sorry but thats BS plain and simple. This is reflected in the very few people who identify themselves as Republicans these days... last I checked (2 months back or so) they were tracking at under 20%

    STOMP
     
  4. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,684
    Likes Received:
    2,779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I'd rather have no laws passed than laws I don't like. I think most people agree with me.

    If obstruction/not passing laws is that unpopular, then Republicans should fare poorly at the polls, don't you think?

    Do you think the GOP will do poorly at the polls later this year?

    Ed O.
     
  5. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,291
    Likes Received:
    5,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
  6. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,291
    Likes Received:
    5,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Hmm. So you believe it's completely political and not tied to a fundamental disagreement about the role of government in our lives? As for funding, Snowe or Collins could switch to the Democratic Party and get a lot more money in Maine.
     
  7. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,291
    Likes Received:
    5,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Not really. The vote occurred in November, 2008. A poll captures the sentiment today. Is it your belief that President Obama would win reelection if the election were tomorrow?
     
  8. Eastoff

    Eastoff But it was a beginning.

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    16,040
    Likes Received:
    4,009
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tualatin
    so do you think the entire republican party just became hypocrites because it was moved unanimously forward.
     
  9. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,291
    Likes Received:
    5,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    They received assurances that the unlimited bailouts the bill allowed for would be off the table. See? It's called principle.
     
  10. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,056
    Likes Received:
    24,946
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Against McCain/Palin? Yeah, I'd take that bet.

    barfo
     
  11. Cake

    Cake Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    572
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Yeah, like those stupid unemployment benefits for people who lost their jobs due to the under-regulation of massive banks whose entire purpose was to make profits that they knew couldn't possibly be sustained and would likely cripple the economy. Out of my face big gubberment!
     
  12. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You mean the over-regulation that provided a safety-net for big banks to make (and encouraged to make) subprime loans. More governmnent FTW!
     

Share This Page