Romney tells millionaires what he really thinks of Obama voters

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by julius, Sep 17, 2012.

  1. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Um, the majority of those polled with incomes under $45k (which the IRS says is the point at which most--not all-- pay no income taxes) said they voted for Obama? :dunno: And the more that you qualify for federal aid, the more inclined a voter was to vote for Obama.
     
  2. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,352
    Likes Received:
    25,387
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    You haven't been very successful at it, keep trying.

    barfo
     
  3. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    So what about that upsets you? People tend to vote in their own self-interest, and 47% of voters pay no federal income tax. I think the real take-away of making this a big deal is to actually inform the public just how large our free-loader country has gotten under the Obama presidency.
     
  4. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,684
    Likes Received:
    13,089
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He said 47% will vote for him regardless, which is to say that a good majority of people will vote their party regardless, and there's a small percentage in the middle who will not. And I understand, those are the people he needs to and wants to target. Have no problem with that. But saying the 47% who will vote forhim regardless pay no income tax is saying that the 47% which are democrats who will vote regardless pay no income tax. In the link you provided, only 38% of all voters fell below that income threshhold. Obama did not get all of those votes, and even if it was 100% in his favor, it owul dnot have equaled the 47%.
     
  5. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gotcha. He's mixing stats. I think the "facts" are that there are 47% of registered voters who are D's and will vote for the D candidate overwhelmingly, and that Romney's targeting the independents like you said. The IRS (I'll dig up the link) put out that in 2010, iirc, 47% of returns filed had no income tax due (and $45k was right the point where people started paying taxes, depending on one's deductions). So you're right: I disagree with him that the 47% registered D's who will vote for him are 1-for-1 the 47% who pay no taxes. However, I don't think it's wrong to say that the high majority of those non-income-tax-paying 47% are a subset of the 47% of those will vote for him regardless.

    Edit: IRS said 45%.
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2012
  6. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,352
    Likes Received:
    25,387
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    I don't think that's a fact, although maybe it is a "fact". Wikipedia say 31% D, 27% R, 40% I as of 2011.

    barfo
     
  7. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd go with "fact", sure. ;)
     
  8. MickZagger

    MickZagger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    37,276
    Likes Received:
    16,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    V-Town Baby
    Crazy, the economy is struggling. Yet, the poor people want Obama re-elected. You'd think it'd be the other way around.
     
  9. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not being argumentative: why would you say that? I'd imagine people who are receiving money and other help from the government without either paying taxes or having to work (and note, I'm not saying that everyone making under 45k falls into that category, but there's a large block of voters who do) will continue to vote for the candidate who'll promise not to take it away, no matter how much it's costing.
     
  10. MickZagger

    MickZagger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    37,276
    Likes Received:
    16,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    V-Town Baby
    Democrats look out for the middle class. Republican's like to line the pockets of those that are already rich.
     
  11. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    The middle class shouldn't need food stamps. Someone's redefining what is middle class.
     
  12. MickZagger

    MickZagger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    37,276
    Likes Received:
    16,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    V-Town Baby
    Strenghten the middle class and they won't. Sending their jobs to China and India and there'll be a lot more food stamps going around.
     
  13. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    2 years of democrats controlling both houses of congress and the white house. $800B in stimulus money spent. About $800B in TARP money spent. The banks got vast sums of money and they bought other banks. The people got foreclosed on by the millions each year.

    But yeah, those Democrats sure watch out for the middle class. Give 'em food stamps on their way down!
     
  14. MickZagger

    MickZagger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    37,276
    Likes Received:
    16,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    V-Town Baby
    You twist stuff to the way you want to see it. Be fair and balanced. If foreclosures are something that happened overnight than you'd be onto something. Snowballs roll down hill and get bigger and bigger before they come to a stop.
     
  15. MickZagger

    MickZagger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    37,276
    Likes Received:
    16,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    V-Town Baby
    http://money.msn.com/mutual-fund/article.aspx?post=09d90714-2402-4772-a6c5-86d2af7ccaed

     
  16. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    So let me get this straight... I "twist" the actual facts somehow, and then you post "it's bush's fault" propaganda? What did Bush do, exactly? He pushed for lower income people to be able to buy homes and join the middle class.

    How does this fit your theory?
     
  17. MickZagger

    MickZagger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    37,276
    Likes Received:
    16,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    V-Town Baby
    Thats not propaganda, its reality. If you really think things were peachy keen when Bush left office you're delusional.
     
  18. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    They weren't peachy keen when Clinton left office or when Carter left office, either.

    Presidents inherit recessions - it's their job to deal with them.

    Regardless, consider the HUGE sums of money spent and where the middle class stands today. Add in another $3T in money the Fed printed to hide massive deficit spending as well.
     
  19. MickZagger

    MickZagger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    37,276
    Likes Received:
    16,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    V-Town Baby
    Question for you:

    Was the economy better when Clinton left office, or Bush?

    No, other words needed, just pick one of the names above.
     
  20. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    About the same.
     

Share This Page