Scoot offseason training

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by illmatic99, Jul 3, 2025.

  1. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    20,781
    Likes Received:
    17,659
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Very possibly. If that's the case we should be tanking for more talent.
     
  2. THE HCP

    THE HCP NorthEastPortland'sFinest

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    71,197
    Likes Received:
    59,810
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    N.E.P.
    It’s ok for you to simply admit that Ant hit HUGE shots for us all the time down the stretch in tight games and that we have NOBODY on this roster that has the history of doing that and that ability will be missed. It’s OK to admit that. It’s not a stretch.
     
    BBert and Pinwheel1 like this.
  3. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    20,781
    Likes Received:
    17,659
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I already have admitted that. I have nothing against Ant.

    He's just not a number one option. He's not a good defender. He's not a good enough distributor. And we were never going to develop a number one option while he was here.

    It's as simple as that.

    If we are going to miss him as much as you seem to be implying then we definitely need to be tanking to get more talent.
     
  4. THE HCP

    THE HCP NorthEastPortland'sFinest

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    71,197
    Likes Received:
    59,810
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    N.E.P.
    His post
    He was our Number one option for the past 2+ seasons though. So he IS a number one option. You may not like it and he wasn’t surrounded by talent enough to have it mean anything, but there is NOBODY on this roster that has been in that position. That’s all I’m saying. Addition by subtraction doesn’t always work. And YES we do need MUCH more talent. A TON more, especially in the middle!
     
    BBert likes this.
  5. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    20,781
    Likes Received:
    17,659
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Correct, I forgot to include the qualifier that he's not in number one option on a quality team.

    I agree, we do need a lot more talent.
     
  6. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    20,781
    Likes Received:
    17,659
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Correct, I forgot to include the qualifier that he's not a number one option *on a quality team. And IMO, you can't build a quality team around him as your number one option.*

    I agree, we do need a lot more talent.
     
  7. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,764
    Likes Received:
    26,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    There were no huge shots during Ant's time with the Blazers.
     
    CJ_is_Gone and Phatguysrule like this.
  8. Phatguysrule

    Phatguysrule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    20,781
    Likes Received:
    17,659
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is a very valid point.
     
  9. julius

    julius Living on the air in Cincinnati... Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    45,027
    Likes Received:
    33,726
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Sales Manager
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    I think, tho, that the rest of the team doesn't really have to cover up for Denis deficiencies.

    That's not to say that a #1 shouldn't have certain (lack of) skills covered by their teammates, Dame did. But the gulf between Dame and Simons, inasmuch as offensively speaking and gravitational pull, is impossible to navigate without a interstellar spaceship.
     
    Phatguysrule likes this.
  10. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,617
    Likes Received:
    20,286
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    I mostly agree with HCP. I think Ant is a valuable player as a sixth man microwave. The debate I'm reading though shouldn't be just about Ant. We traded him for Jrue. If we're going to debate a moot question, the debate should be Ant v. Jrue, who provides what, and which one is better for the team as constructed. I'll take Jrue's overall game and experience and look for another shooter.
     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2025 at 4:05 PM
  11. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,958
    Likes Received:
    57,070
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    And who has the most value at the trade deadline. Doesn't seem to be Simons at all. Not sure how much Jrue has though.
     
    BBert likes this.
  12. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,617
    Likes Received:
    20,286
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    No Blazers player the last two seasons has received as much defensive pressure while being called on to hit tough shots as Ant. I laugh when I see people compare the shooting percentage or consistency of some guy who stands in the corner taking open, easy threes to someone like Ant or Dame who have to deal with intense pressure on every possession while having to manufacture heavily contested shots.
     

Share This Page