<div class="quote_poster">Quoting NTC187:</div><div class="quote_post">lol. We could make it past the second round, no sweat, its just a matter of wether we can or not, and that boils down to circumstances at the time. If the Spurs could win a championship with Nazr Muhammed at C, there is no reason why we cant. Ben was a big part of our team, you're right, but he can and has been replaced, not only on court, but off. As you said, we have alot of veteran leadership in the lockeroom. We still are a very defensive minded team without Ben, with Tayshaun Prince, Chauncey Billups, Rasheed Wallace all premier defenders, and coming off the bench we have guys like Dale Davis, Ronald Dupree etc. I think I have predicted our winning record for next season in another topic, but regardless, I think we'll go somthing like 52-30, but we're easily capable of doing better than that.</div><div class="quote_poster">Quoting "Heat4Life":</div><div class="quote_post">It's really not that simple, and Robert Horry played a lot of PF and C along with Duncan in the playoffs. Hell, IIRC, Horry even played more minutes than Nazr in the Finals.</div><div class="quote_poster">Quoting NTC187:</div><div class="quote_post"><font color=""Red"">So what?</font> The bottom line is, we'll still do well, with or without Ben Wallace or Nazr Mohammed.</div>You are aware you contradicted yourself right? You went from "If the Spurs can win a title with Nazr so can we" to "We're still gonna be good". w/e, i'll be on my way out ...
Thats not a contradiction. I said "if the Spurs can win a title with Nazr Mohammed at C, then so can we". Wether we have Nazr or no Ben, we still will be a good team. Where is the contradiction in that? Oh thats right, there is none
