Sorry, doesn't work that way. YOU brought it up, you fucking do the search for it and prove yourself right.
It does work that way. He said something and you are questioning the accuracy. Prove its inaccurate. Its that simple.
…… Draft scouts like Chad Ford were very high on him. “Darko was just phenomenal. It couldn’t have been more perfect in a certain way. At some point the coaches got involved and asked to see particular things. And Darko couldn’t miss and was aggressive and rose to the moment with the players watching. I was sitting next to (Dumars). He’s not expressive, he plays everything close to the vest. But Darko was just so impressive. It was literally the best workout I’ve ever seen. https://www.nbadraft.net/forums/topic/how-good-was-darko-milicic-projected-to-be/
It absolutely does not. The burden of proof lies in the individual making the claim. One could choose to roove them wrong, but burden of proof doesn't work that way.
We shall have to disagree. If someone says something and i say they are wrong, i believe its on me to show why they are wrong. I take ownership of telling someone they are wrong anyhow. Or try to. And i think i just showed in the next post how silly it even was to ask for proof. Its just lazy to me. Do a bit of research and if you don't find it, THEN ask for proof.
No it doesn't. I dont' get to say something and then be like "no, you look it up!". If I say something, the onus is on me to prove it, not the other way around.
But you just did! HahHa you said he was wrong and then told him to look it up. Anyhow i did all that hard work for you. Bill is in the mail.
I watched a few videos on DM, and it kinda sounds like there was really only one advanced scout (for the Pistons) who was high on him, and Chad Ford. And that was after a very limited exposure. Thing is, there wasn't as much footage of Darko back 20 years ago, as there is currently of Sharpe. And the college/high school scouting game is a lot better now than the European scouting game was 20 years ago. And the main thing I got from those videos I watched? Darko had a massively inflated sense of his talent.
I didn't say he was wrong. I said "Who said that about Darko?" and "So it wouldn't be difficult to find multiple reports saying that?" No where in that did the word "wrong" appear, nor did I say anything remotely close to that. I basically asked for proof.
So then one could say....Dame drinks like a fish. Dame hates Joe Cronin. Dame called LaMarcus a pig fucker. Why should I have to prove that it is correct. Try to prove it isn't.
