Shocking new video shows unarmed Utah man was listening to headphones when killed by police

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by SlyPokerDog, Jun 4, 2015.

  1. 3RA1N1AC

    3RA1N1AC 00110110 00111001

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    20,918
    Likes Received:
    5,168
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Looks like he was lifting his shirt up to show the cop he didn't have a gun.

    If cops weren't such cowards, he would still be alive, but the pig was too afraid.
     
    magnifier661 likes this.
  2. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, until we can get robots to arrest people, we'll have to make due with humans that fear for their own life. If you reach into your pants when a cop has gun drawn on you, you'll get shot more often that not.
     
  3. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,685
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Humans are supposed to exercise judgment, and when deadly force is involved, that judgment needs to be beyond reproach. Human fallibility is not an excuse for taking another's life unjustifiably.
     
  4. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh please. There is nothing cowardly about apprehending armed and dangerous criminals. What would have you done if your life was on the line? It's not a video game where you get 3 lives.
     
  5. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Right. So what if you pull a fake gun on a cop and he shoots you? Are you going to whine about his lack of judgement and fallibility?
     
  6. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
  7. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,685
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We're not talking about me, or about a person who had a fake gun. We're talking about a person who was adjusting his pants, and about a cop who, in your words, was so spooked that he thought it appropriate to use deadly force in a situation where there was no imminent threat, and no weapon was present. There is nothing in that video indicating any need for deadly force, and no justification for it.

    Implicit with the authority to use deadly force when necessary is the restriction to use it ONLY when absolutely necessary. Violation of that implicit understanding should be considered criminal.
     
  8. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Also, this kid made a FB post the day before saying that he'd rather die than go back to prison. So the fact that he'd defy a police officer who was pointing a gun at him, and reach into his waist band makes me wonder if he was trying to get shot.
     
  9. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,785
    Likes Received:
    145,046
    Trophy Points:
    115
    What I was wondering is why after the cop searched him and didn't find a weapon why did he leave him handcuffed? At the point the guy hadn't committed a crime, was bleeding out and was not a threat to the officers.
     
    magnifier661 likes this.
  10. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,785
    Likes Received:
    145,046
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Also it was a little odd that the officer didn't try to stop the bleeding. I doubt it would have done much good but I find it rather cold to watch someone die and not do anything.
     
  11. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But you admit that it doesn't matter if the gun is fake, it's about what the police officer can reasonably believe in the situation. Officers are not omnicient and they have to make split second decisions. If the dude reached into his back pocket to pull out a comb to come his hair, you can't blame the cop for that horrendous stupidity.

    In this particular situation, his actions were very much like pulling a fake gun. He stuck his hands into front of his baggy waiste band, and menancingly refused to take them out, telling the officer "no, fool". He wasn't fixing his pants.
     
  12. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,685
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, I absolutely can blame the cop for assuming a weapon is there when he doesn't see anything of the sort. This, it appears, is where you and I disagree. In my opinion, the should be absolutely no ambiguity of the situation in order to justify deadly force. You apparently seem to believe cops should have the right to shoot people if they have the slightest inkling that things might be turning violent. I believe a higher standard should be required.
     
  13. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But too often, being absolutely sure is too late. It's not a realistic expectation. If you just take the fake gun for example, what would it realistically take for a cop to stop and verify that every gun that was pulled on them was real and loaded? "Oh, excuse me sir, before we start this gunfight, may I please examine your weapon?"
     
  14. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,324
    Likes Received:
    43,685
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I've been ignoring your fake gun strawman because it's a false equivalency. In that situation, the person wants the cop to believe that he has a deadly weapon, that someone's life is in danger. This isn't that.

    A more apropo comparison might be civilian home defense. Homeowners have the legal right to use deadly force to defend their home, but they do not have the right to shoot at any person who enters their home uninvited. A clear and present danger must exist to justify use of deadly force. Police should be subject to at least the same standard, if not one that is more stringent.
     
  15. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's not a false equivalency, because you can lead an officer to believe you are pulling a gun on them even without having a fake gun. It undermines your argument that a shooting is only justified if the person really had a gun.

    And remember, he didn't just randomly drive up to someone and decide to pull his gun out, he was responding to a report of someone brandishing a gun.

    Police are subject to those laws, they can't go around and randomly kill people.
     
  16. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,785
    Likes Received:
    145,046
    Trophy Points:
    115
    And an unarmed white person is shot and no one in SLC riots or protests? White people are lame.
     
  17. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,585
    Likes Received:
    27,459
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did you watch the video?
     
  18. Further

    Further Guy

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    11,099
    Likes Received:
    4,039
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Stuff doer
    Location:
    Place
    It's a tough situation. The cop was wrong, poorly trained and far too scared to make rational decisions in times of stress. But sending him to Jail also doesn't solve the problem, it just compounds the situation. Just as I'm not for stuffing our jails with nonviolent drug offenders because all it does is ruin lives and cost money, I'm also not interested in filling the cells with clean cops who make bad stress related decisions. This cop should never have been given a badge and should certainly be fired and banned from future police jobs. But jail isn't the answer.

    But the training, monitoring and equipment of this cop needs to be torn down and revamped for future officers. No cop should be allowed to hit the streets with a gun if she/he can't remain calm under pressure. No cop should be on patrol without a less lethal option like s tazor,

    This whole situation, and the rash of similar ones needs to be addressed in every police academy and police station throughout our lands. Policy must be more strict and training more thorough. We can find the extra money by cutting down on sending nonviolent lawbreakers to jail.
     
    MarAzul and oldmangrouch like this.
  19. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    124,785
    Likes Received:
    145,046
    Trophy Points:
    115
  20. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,403
    Likes Received:
    6,325
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What were they using on that house? I find it real hard to believe that damage was inflicted by flash-bangs.

    BTW, you will note that the innocent homeowner's insurance company is on the hook for the damages.
     

Share This Page