Siakam Or Simmons?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Chris Craig, Jul 31, 2021.

?

Who would you rather the Blazers trade for Siakam or Simmons

  1. Pascal Siakam

    50 vote(s)
    56.2%
  2. Ben Simmons

    39 vote(s)
    43.8%
  1. calvin natt

    calvin natt Confeve

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2017
    Messages:
    7,520
    Likes Received:
    10,457
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland Suburb
    I feel like Marvin Bagley is a prime Neil target. Injury prone first two years but clearly a young, long, athletic talent. Bagley and Barnes? Bagley and Haliburton for CJ, Nurkic
     
  2. MickZagger

    MickZagger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    33,622
    Likes Received:
    12,059
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    V-Town Baby
    Lillard would be good as gone if that trade to happen. Bagley and Halliburton might be better than CJ and Nurk some day, but not now and Lillard wants to win now.
     
    Chris Craig and RR7 like this.
  3. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    30,279
    Likes Received:
    23,039
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Murray is gonna be out for most of the year.
     
    Idog1976 likes this.
  4. KSF-ERIC

    KSF-ERIC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2019
    Messages:
    8,659
    Likes Received:
    6,450
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lakers are trash. Warriors have problems since they couldn’t even make playoffs with healthy Curry. And yes, Murray is out. Why do you hate Phoenix?
     
    Idog1976 likes this.
  5. KSF-ERIC

    KSF-ERIC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2019
    Messages:
    8,659
    Likes Received:
    6,450
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Or Utah for that matter?
     
    Idog1976 likes this.
  6. stampedehero

    stampedehero Make Your Day, a Doobies Day Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    12,451
    Likes Received:
    9,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Part Time Building Inspector
    Location:
    NJ
    First, Simmons isn't coming here. Besides that,he is a choke artist. Siakom won't come here as Portland has a negative free agency destination smeared on the city by the media.
     
  7. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    42,643
    Likes Received:
    24,141
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Siakam is not a free agent
     
  8. Hoopguru

    Hoopguru Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2014
    Messages:
    19,725
    Likes Received:
    16,290
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Either one would be fine with me.
    Rip City
     
    Phatguysrule and Idog1976 like this.
  9. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    14,008
    Likes Received:
    14,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Are you getting these two guys mixed up with a superstar like Dame? These guys are not on the level of turning down trade destinations: Ben is locked up for four years and Siakam has three. Both guys could be had without crippling the roster. Despite the fact that you labeled Simmons a choke artist I would give up CJ three firsts and four swaps for Simmons and I think Morey would take it... if Morey demanded four firsts and three swaps I'd probably cave and do that too. As far as Siakam goes, I think if we got a third team involved we could get him for CJ and a first rounder.

    The point was that both guys would talk about how they can't wait to play with Dame and be the foundation of the team with him, not about the reputation the city has because of the media. Besides superstars, NBA players know that being traded wherever is part of the job description... what they think of a city comes into play when they are free agents.

    Obviously this is all conjecture but it's a theory that has a little more history on it side than yours does.
     
    stampedehero and Idog1976 like this.
  10. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    116,524
    Likes Received:
    114,539
    Trophy Points:
    115
    I'm just talking playoffs. Which Murray should be back for.

    I don't hate Phoenix. I think if we add Siakim & Simmons we would be better than them.

    I think if we add Siakim & Simmons we would be better than them.

    But sure, let's add them to the list.

    Even if we add Siakim & Simmons, Phoenix, Utah, Lakers, GS, and Denver are still better if they are healthy.
     
  11. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    90,282
    Likes Received:
    52,341
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I think Golden state is past their expiration date. The Lakers just gutted their bench to get Statbrook. I don’t think either of those teams win it next year unless they make a major addition this summer.
     
    Idog1976 likes this.
  12. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    116,524
    Likes Received:
    114,539
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Okay, so IYO does adding either or both of those players to the Blazers make us a championship contender?
     
  13. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    90,282
    Likes Received:
    52,341
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Possibly but there are too many unknowns until the season starts.

    What does Neil do with the bench? That’s just as big a question mark as adding a player like Simmons or Siakam.

    Dame
    Norm
    RoCo
    Simmons or Siakam
    Nurk

    That’s a championship caliber starting unit. But what does the bench look like? how good of a coach is Chauncey? So many questions that need answered.

    But I would say Golden State has just as many questions. As do the Lakers.
     
    Idog1976, Phatguysrule and RR7 like this.
  14. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    21,081
    Likes Received:
    13,621
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Like all of you, I would take either player. Although I doubt we get either. I voted for Siakam because I think he fits in better with the remaining roster on offense. (He can create his own shot) But it would be nice to have a guy like Simmons who you could actually put on either LBJ or AD and feel confident about him slowing either down.

    For that matter, you could put Simmons on any team's best player like Kawhi, or PG, Booker, Doncic, Michae Porter, Mitchell, Curry etc etc.
    Jokic would be the one guy that would a problem for him.

    I may have to change my vote. That would be a nice luxury to have.
     
  15. ebott

    ebott Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    685
    Likes Received:
    165
    Trophy Points:
    43
    The sad truth is I'd be overjoyed to have either but both are so much more valuable than CJ there's no chance we get either of them.
     
    Wizard Mentor likes this.
  16. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    21,081
    Likes Received:
    13,621
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Value is different for each team. CJ has lots of value, just not for either of those two teams. I mean look at the Lakers, who do they need more right now.... CJ or Simmons?
     
  17. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    30,279
    Likes Received:
    23,039
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Both Simmons and Siakam have more value to more teams than CJ. I think that clearly affects their overall value around the league, no?
     
  18. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    14,008
    Likes Received:
    14,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think team needs are important. I don't see a team need for CJ with Toronto honestly but he is exactly what the Sixers need. With what they have on that roster already, CJ is the perfect fit. Obviously if you're trying to get Simmons for CJ a lot of assets have to be added (that being said, I think if Olshey would just admit that to himself he could just throw in all of our future draft capital possible and get the deal done). If you're trying to get Siakam for CJ a future first and a third team seem to be needed.

    I know CJ's value in the league varies from team to team, Siakam probably has a pretty steady value among GMs and Simmons is probably wildly different depending on who you talk to. With CJ it comes down to fit and what you need. With Siakam unless you have two all star forwards you could use him. With Simmons it has to do with risk reward, recency bias, fit... there are just a lot of variables.
     
  19. UKRAINEFAN

    UKRAINEFAN Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    13,648
    Likes Received:
    10,977
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    un-retired
    Location:
    Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Ukraine
    Did I miss the trade proposal where we get both those guys?
     
    BBert likes this.
  20. tykendo

    tykendo Don't Tread On PDX

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    7,214
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hell NO!
     
    BonesJones likes this.

Share This Page