Jews are a race. That is a protected class. I'm not sure what mirror you're referring to. I wouldn't want to do business with any company that was discriminating against Jews, "left-wing scum", or environmentalists. Those companies would see their bottom line take a hit, and there would be alternative opportunities with more upstanding institutions for those who were being discriminated against to do business with. And if there were a national bank that handled basic services with no fees it simply wouldn't matter. We'd be a much stronger country and have much less poverty as a result. And we'd have much better private banks as well.
ohh. Boy. Where to even start… You have way too much trust in the government if you want them to handle our personal/private banking. Id much prefer the gov prevent banking cohersion vs taking over the banking for the government to then manipulate. Anyhow, i think your thinking on this os way off base… You said so much in this paot you dodnt say i nthe other. Of course businesses shoildnt be forced to deal woth criminals, but that isnt what you said. You said antivaxers and those who claim false truths, which also isnt a crime. It was not illegal to not get a vaccine, so you are clearly tossing out contradicting statements and then correcting yourself later without admitting it. Are you going to claim you have never said something not factual? And who determiens the fact? Based on your antivaxer comment, its opinion based. Not factual. you have completely run a circle with your opinions on this. One minute its companies shouldnt have to deal with those they disagree with politically, to “they shouldnt have to deal with criminals”. Are you saying antivaxers are criminals? Thar would be an intentionally false claim and you should be banned from this site for purposely staring false information. Blazers should never allow you in to see their games because you intentional and falsely claimed antivaxers are criminals. see how that works? Something tells me you dont though. Nobody said anything aBout businesses having to do business with criminals. Having a political opinion is not a crime, in case you weren't aware… Can pro lifers deny business to pro abortionists? can anti gun people deny business to gun owners? the path you are wanting to walk down will lead to our downfall. Can hospitals deny health to pro natural healing believers? The list can go on and on. But you changed the topic to criminals out of the blue.
Hey. Those who dont get enough vitamin c are more susceptible to getting the flu. Those who dont make sure they have enough vitamin c in their system are a health risk and should be denied doing business with anyone because its a crime!!! What crazy logic being tossed around in here….
Many governments offer these services. It would force banks to be less predatory or risk losing good clients. This would help prevent collusion among banks and help empower our marginalized populations. That's fine. It's alright to disagree. I don't think I said anything about criminals, which would be a person convicted of a crime. I specifically said "crooks" instead, because I was referring to somebody who is dishonest or untrustworthy. I'm not following you. Yeah, I didn't say criminals. But the Blazers can ban anybody from games that they want. I didn't claim an opinion was a crime. Sure. Yes, I'm pretty sure they can. I disagree. No, hospitals are required by law to give care to anybody who needs it. I don't think I said anything about criminals...
crooks aNd con men vs criminals. Semantics. You want to deny business to those who have not broke the law because of thier political stance… thats a bad path. We shall have to agree to disagree.
Or it could be as easy as company selling sketchy medical products isn't processing customer refunds when asked so customers are going to their bank and asked to make whole. Banks will close your shit down if you cost them money. This isn't the Guberment telling Chase to do anything. Or... This is a giant conspiracy of the guberment telling banks to hide the truth.
Also what gets people kicked out of their Airbnb like this person is claiming there will only be 2 people using the rental and showing up with more.
Call it semantics if you want, criminal and crook are different words for a reason. They have different definitions and can mean different things. It's fine. It's been corrected. No, I haven't advocated for denying business to anybody. I have advocated for people and businesses to retain their right to freedom of association.
And government telling the banks to exclude people they disagree with would be unconstitutional. Nobody is supporting that.
I totally support the government telling banks not to do business with international drug traffickers and fake charities that are fronts for terrorist organizations. HAS NO ONE SEEN COCAINE COWBOYS?!?
Lots of people support that! you really should stop using the statements “nobody” and “everybody”. It makes you sound very disconnected with reality. Ive been stating i support such things thst you responded to yet say no one supports that? Sometimes its hard to take you serious when you make statements like that. Broad generalistic statements advocating you know what everyone thinks…. moving on now because…
Lol. It's funny that you take anything I say in this thread and try to make it out like I'm speaking for every person in the world. I'm talking about the posters in this thread. Nobody in this thread is supporting the government controlling who companies conduct business with based on ideologies. But by all means, maybe I'm reading the room wrong. If anybody does support that, please speak up and prove me wrong.
You know whats not funny and if i were you id be concerned? is that both sly and i made a point we DO support such things. And you you still post this clearly showing you dont read what you respond to. I find that disrespectful. I mean wth? Lol. Its clear as day above some people support government regulation of some business and their operation. Why dont you say nobody in this thread then? Were talking a out government regulation. AGAIN many poster refer to others outside of this forum ALL THE TIME and use as reference… your, i meant nobody in this forum is just a ruse for you to claim you are never wrong… I love how you generalize so you can never be wrong. But even now you are still wrong. Id be concerned if i were you… Reading comprehension 101: Sly said he supports things like the government stopping businesses from supporting certain things. I said the same. Yet you claim “nobody” has. Either you seriously lack reading skills or you are sooo pompous as to think your opinion is the only one and”nobody” else registers with you. Be better. I know you can. Ive seen it. now carry on with “‘nobody’ disagrees with you on anything” road you continue to march down.
I give up. Its plastered all over this thread that some people support governing regulations on business. Selective reading and conversations are annoying as hell. Have fun.
Sorry man. I dont want to fight but you are clearly saying things and referring to posts in this thread inaccurately. If you arent able to see that then yes. Its annoying and absolutely an eye roll moment. Ive been rolling mine for an hour now reading some of your responses, sayong nobody does this or that when there are posts that clearly show you are wrong. But instead of admitting as much you post this meme instead… go figure. You are never wrong… lol. Maybe if you just admitted that both sly and i disagree with you and we posted it in this thread, it would lead to much more constructive convos. but when you cant admit those types of things… yeah you become annoying to read. As well as lose my trust or good faith in anything else you post.
