Spurs crush Trail Blazers 116-92 in Game 1 behind 33 points from Tony Parker

It's not a part of my shtick. Trolling is allowed on the Spurs board; it isn't here. Those are the forum rules, not a "shtick."

 

The Constitution doesn't apply to private message boards. What a stupid post.

 

I have to imagine that part of maxiep's outrage at the mods here ties into his own banning on the Rocket board. Christ, I read at least 4 posts here where he was whining about it, and I don't read every thread.

I wonder how many emails he has sent the site admin to have his ban there lifted?

 

I think he just desperately seeks acceptance and he is arguing with everyone since there are so many spurs fans around. He knows this is his only chance to get in their books, and that at the end of the day we will take him back. I agree about the rockets board, the fact that he went off about that showed that it was important to him.

1 email is my guess.

 

Wow, was that an ironic post. Thanks for the laugh!

 

Thanks for your insight, Professor Obama. However, I wasn't referring to our Constitutional right, but thanks for playing!

 

You think way too much about me. I had my reasons for broadcasting it on this board, which seems to have gone right past you.

 

Yes, I always wanted to be part of the "cool kids" table. Hilarious stuff, Fonz. I mean, really top notch.

 

What were you referring too, then? Start your own message board; then you can run it as you see fit.

 

You were whining about being banned from the Rockets board, and now you're whining about mods banning a poster who clearly deserved to be banned. I'm commenting on it. For someone who is mocking NB3 about caring, it sure appears that you care a lot about message boards, too.

To add to the hilarity, you're not making any sense, yet you're accusing those wondering what the hell you're talking about as being unintelligent.

 

Well, I was referring to the mods having a lighter touch on the ban button. Get it now, sparky?

 

I bet this is what you are thinking on your responses, cause to me that seems to be the effort you are putting forth.

 

You're the one who keeps bringing me up, not the other way around. Obsession isn't a good color on you.

And it seems once again you missed the point about what Nate and I were discussing, but that's not too surprising.

 

What's with the cute little names you put into your posts? "Sparky?" It's high school stuff.

 

Don't go to Vegas.

 

My, aren't you the curious one for someone who thinks so little about me.

 

I'm bringing you up because I find your antics both humorous and juvenile. Look, I'm certainly not known as any big defender of moderators, but berating them for banning some new poster who has a scat fetish, and likes to share it with others on this board, is a dumb idea.

 

It was a question. Why do you put derogatory nicknames in many of your posts? Maybe it pumps you up a bit, but to me, it comes across as a guy who is losing the argument, and then needs to try to provoke an emotional response, rather than a rational criticism.

 

When are you going to throw a hissy next and beg to be banned?

Like I said, I defend free speech. If someone wants to post something so stupid, I think the proper response is to let it stand as a monument to their idiocy for all to see.

 

And I answered it. Too bad, you didn't understand it the first time.