She's absolutely right. She's either too dumb or too well paid to call out her corporate bigwigs that make that happen. A poor guy can't compete now.
We're hiring a new guy at work. Why? Because I just fucking helped double our sales for the month. Demand. That's why we're hiring a new in house installer. Plain and simple.
Your business is run by a bunch of poor people on welfare? Or you sell things to poor people? My point is that corporate greed keeps poor people from creating jobs. Try and compete with Walmart or Amazon or Apple and see what happens. The only obvious success I see regularly is small coffee shops competing with Starbucks. Starbucks is just soooooo terrible it is easy to attract customers. That said, the places I go cost a tiny bit more than Starbucks.
We sell KOHLER walk in baths. Poor, Old people are our main customers. Again, if there wasn't a demand, there would be no new job for the installer we're hiring.
But I grew up poor. Really poor, in a really poor neighborhood. Newt would say since that was the case I would have "no habits of working"... We were really poor and my mother worked 2 jobs on Monday NEWT!
Let's not forget this PUNK ASS in the white house was on board with FIRING the union janitor and hiring CHILD LABOR to clean the school... MOTHERFUCKER.... I wan't my son's nose in a BOOK not a toilet!! FUCK YOU GOOD SIR... FUCK YOU... Donald Trump and Newt Gingrich devise 'Apprentice'-style plan for poor kids Newt Gingrich, who recently criticized child labor laws as 'stupid,' has dreamed up an 'Apprentice'-style plan with Donald Trump that would put 10 'apprenti' from New York City schools to work. Remember last month, when Newt Gingrich took heat for saying child labor laws are "truly stupid"? The GOP presidential candidate isn't backing away from his comments. Instead, he just keeps refining his point – or, depending on whom you talk to, digging himself deeper into a hole. His latest idea, dreamed up during his summit with real estate mogul and reality TV host, Donald Trump: an "Apprentice"-style plan in which The Donald would select 10 "apprenti" (Mr. Trump's term) from New York Cityschools and put them to work. "It was Newt's idea, and I thought it was a great idea," said Trump, appearing with Mr. Gingrich in a press conference, and adding, "I think it's going to be something that's going to really prove results." It's less clear whether New York City's Department of Education will think it's a great idea, especially given the numbers involved. Nearly three-quarters of the city's 1.25 million school children qualify for free or reduced lunches, and 29 percent are below the poverty line. Also, though Gingrich said he and Trump hope to "create a model" for a program that engages students in work, numerous schools around the country have already implemented larger-scale apprenticeship programs into their curriculum. (Janitorial work – Gingrich's recent proposal – is not generally a focus.) Gingrich has been looping back to the theme of poor children and jobs for several weeks now, but seems to be struggling to make his point without sounding tone deaf. After the Harvard appearance Nov. 18 in which he criticized child labor laws, Gingrich later tried to elaborate, telling an Iowa audience that poor children have "no habits of working and have nobody around them who works," and aren't used to getting paid "unless it's illegal." He has also suggested that children in the poorest schools should be allowed to serve as janitors in those schools to give them work experience, money, and a connection to the school. The reaction from some quarters has been harsh. "He comes across as a callous Dickensian character in his attitude toward America’s most vulnerable – our poor children," opined New York Times columnist Charles Blow Dec. 2, saying that Gingrich had "reached a new low." (Mr. Blow also pointed out some fallacies in Gingrich's "facts," including the statement that poor children don't have working adults in their lives.) And when Gingrich tried to clarify his original comments by saying that "kids shouldn't work in coal mines, kids shouldn't work in heavy industry," Politico noted that that's the sort of statement that "probably falls into the 'if you have to say it ...' category." Still, Gingrich and Trump emerged from their meeting gushing mutual admiration. Gingrich called Trump "a genuine American icon in his own right." That's in marked contrast to fellow GOP candidate Ron Paul, who is opting out of the Trump-hosted debate this Saturday and called Trump "cutesy." Gingrich declared himself mystified at Paul's comments criticizing the debate saying, "I'm actually very surprised that one of my friends would have said that." For his part, Trump was equally enamored of Gingrich. He said he's "a big fan" of the former House speaker, and added that "it's amazing how well he's doing and how it's really resonated with so many people."
Well, I don't want to play defense for Newt, but it doesn't seem he was speaking of you. You had the example of the habit of working. Might have been speaking of me since I lost my examples early, but then Newt wasn't speaking of my generation because I could and did work. It was before they made all the laws that make it so children can not work, even when they need it. The need to pay your rent will indeed make work a habit.
No, he said really poor people don't have a habit of working. He also said, they "don't know how to show up on Monday". Extreme utter bullshit. We were dirt poor and my mother showed up to 2 jobs on Monday.
Looks like someone did something incompetent with photoshop to the bikini bottom area... or she's got some terrible scarring down there... barfo
Believe what I will?? He says it right outta his mouth... Jesus.... You like to insult my intelligence...
I am not insulting you or your intelligence in anyway. I simply pointed out, the same words do not mean the same thing to you as they do to me. Not nearly so negative to me. Thus, I believe you enjoy being shit on.
