Because there are 2 very polarized groups. Plus I was replying to yank doing just the same thing. Let me ask you a question. Would you accept an article from Breitbart or Fox News as a reputable source?
Depends upon who wrote it and what they wrote...I don't subscribe to any periodicals but my preference at the library is to read the Wall Street Journal, Utne or the Economist....I can single out individuals that work for those organizations that I think are endlessly full of shit but I try to not make blanket statements unless they are about say.....Soldier of Fortune magazine or some specific targeted group. Fox news has aired enough bullshit that I put them at the bottom of the major networks for trustworthy coverage. I don't trust Trump and he trusts Fox news...or used to...like CNN is to Democrats...Fox seems to be to Republicans.....I've always read the news with skepticism...because, y'know
You're one person and one person only. Do you carry any validity from what you trot out? Meh. You made the comment not to conflate/confuse arrogance with confidence. I maintain Trump has both. Big whoop.
Yes big whoop, but then here you are arguing about it. obviously a bigger whoop than you are claiming.
Your responses are indeed laughable at times. Probably why I have so much fun toying around with you. Oh, and I meant to thank you for removing me from your ignore status.
People still look at signatures? You know you can hide those, don't you? It makes the forum so much easier to read. That way you don't have to scroll through them like a Maris post every thread. To each their own.
If that's a joke about personal poster signatures on this forum, I get it, and yes, I know they can be hidden. ...otherwise, that's not at all what I was referring to. ( re; Trump's signature)
Gosh, your razor wit is riveting. I'm sure you have them in stitches at your Moose lodge get-togethers.
I discovered that when mags had a yellow wandering eyeball for his sig....probably haven't allowed sigs since then
