https://memes.yarn.co/yarn-clip/4db9987c-309d-4439-b364-86e05d74258e (Somehow, there's no built in video embed support for Yarn.co. I'm shocked too.)
Interesting opinion. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...c0wOhnxDvPmbIOxszDo4wxlRj1ixL6C_rxbLhBR9TDblg
Not to mention that there's a big difference between a Senate trial/confirmation and a criminal trial. Seems that the spin doctors are working overtime these days.
So a woman should be believed during a senate confirmation but not a criminal case? I personally think that it shouldn’t matter either way. You wait until the facts come in either way.
Didn't say that but to your point, evidently she wasn't believed, right?...I assume you're referring to the Cavanaugh case? And don't forget, there was more than just one person who testified against Brett. As far as waiting for the facts, there aren't any really other than Reade coming out of the woodwork with nothing but here-say, and a friend who now mysteriously claims to remember Tara saying something to her about it almost 30 years ago. Without actual evidence, it's just another "nothing-burger", IMO and not compelling at all unless that's simply what someone chooses to believe. Even if this were to go to trial, and it won't, the jury won't consist of a GOP led Senate.
Reade’s mother had a call in 1993 on CNN regarding it. Biden supporter collaborated Reade’s story. If this is a nothing burger, then the senate should open up their archives so it goes away. Apparently, Reade claims she filed a complaint in the senate during the time of the alleged incident.