Wrong analogy... Now if members of my church did that, then I would be fully responsible. These are actual "Districts" of the movement, which means it would be as if the same church was doing this. All BLM has to do is publicly say "We do not support or agree with the actions of the Black Panthers or other militant groups" Just as current christians say "We do not support the KKK or WBB church"
Mags, you could go and kill a bunch of Mexicans and then claim you were the leader of the California Elect Donald Trump organization. Would that be Donald Trump's fault? Should Trump have known you were going to go off the deep edge and start killing Mexicans? You would be a direct representative of Mr Trump. If someone uses the #Trump2016 hashtag and says something hateful does that makes Donald Trump responsible for those statements? If someone calls into a radio station and claims they're the leader of their local Elect Trump group and proceeds to say a bunch of hateful shit then again, according to your reasoning and the assumptions of the links you're posting that makes Trump responsible. If people at a Trump rally start chanting, "Mexicans are rapists! Kill them all!" again, according to your reasoning that makes Trump responsible for those comments. Sorry, I'm just not buying it.
As I already posted... Christians can take a public stand and say "We do not support the terrorist acts of WBB or the KKK". That statement alone will wash the church's hands.
Nice hyperbole And all Trump has to do is publicly say "I do not support the terrorist actions of Mags" Why hasn't BLM publicly said this? Oh yeah, that's right, because they support their actions.
All Black Lives Matter has to say is pretty simple. "We at Black Lives Matter do not support the hate groups like Black Panthers or other militant groups like them"
So Civil War museums are responsible for the KKK using the Confederate Flag? Or are you saying the southern states who flew the confederate flag during the civil war are responsible for the actions of the KKK?
Nice strawman... Legislators and historians have publicly explained the true meaning of that flag. No one other than racists, which was refuted publicly believes that's the symbol of the KKK
It's actually not hyperbole at all. They are already doing it. I posted what people at his rallies where saying, wishing they could get paid to hunt along the Mexican border, the white supremacists agreeing with him, wanting to name a newly founded city after him and your response was that it didn't matter unless it came out of Trump's mouth.
It actually is... If I did these atrocities and Trump said nothing of the matter, then the public can assume this is the case. But when Trump publicly states, "I do not or will not support mags for his violent acts" his hand is clean
No one has accused them, but if someone did, I guarantee they would publicly state it... BLM has been accused all over the place and not a single public statement
Just because someone doesn't say they're against something or someone doesn't mean they're for it. I've never seen you say you're against people who have sex with cats. That means you must be a cat fucker.
Wait what?!? If the KKK didn't think that was a symbol why in the hell do they wave it around so much? They just think it's pretty?
I think it's like the Hell's Angels..they use the same logo but at the top it says Fresno or wherever they're from