More from Penn: Special Counsel Mueller will need to show restraint — review all the evidence, subpoena any added relevant documents, and if there is any evidence of actual collusion, go for it. If not, then he must tell the American people promptly that this was whipped up on theories with no foundation and close it out, giving back to Justice any small-fry subsidiary cases. While 75 percent of respondents in a recent Harvard Harris Poll said they favored a special counsel to look into potential collusion, 73 percent also believe the special counsel should look at the unmasking, snooping and leaking that occurred during the Obama administration. Someone — either Mueller or another counsel — is going to have to take a hard look at that issue and similarly either put it to rest or find out more. The Democrats, just like the Republicans of 1998, are going to have to decide if this path is the right one for themselves and the country. They have been the main drivers of the Russia theories, and 68 percent of the voters believe the Democrats have never accepted the results of the election.
Is Trump Now a Subject of the Mueller Investigation? While the Justice Department and Robert Mueller, the special counsel, have not commented on whether they are investigating Trump, several former federal prosecutors told me that if he’s not yet, he soon will be—or at least should be. Former prosecutors who have served in both Republican and Democratic Administrations told me that an obstruction-of-justice case against Trump is a no-brainer. “Comey’s testimony in a grand jury would be enough to get an indictment,” Julie O’Sullivan, who was part of the team that investigated Whitewater, the Clinton land deal that attracted a special prosecutor in the early nineties, said. To O’Sullivan, Comey’s detailed account of the Oval Office meeting in which Trump cleared the room and then told Comey to let go of the investigation of Michael Flynn, whom Trump had fired, the previous day, was especially damning because it showed that Trump knew that what he was doing was wrong. “For a prosecutor, this attempt to hide the conversation, all antenna are going up,” O’Sullivan told me. “That tells you that he has a consciousness that what he’s about to do is wrong. It’s like having a bonfire with documents in the back yard. It’s wonderful. Seriously, this is the best thing ever for a prosecutor.”
Did I MENTION HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Here's some more made-up shit I found on Google. http://www.breitbart.com/big-journa...is-why-america-hates-and-distrusts-the-media/
Hey, just noticing on that Breitbart website you can save money on cable and there was a Trump daughter in a swimsuit. You're welcome
How pathetic this all was. Another nothingburger. http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/337703-white-house-trump-has-no-intention-to-fire-mueller White House: Trump 'has no intention' of firing Mueller ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE — President Trump has “no intention” of firing Robert Mueller as special counsel leading the Russia investigation, the White House said Tuesday. “While the president has the right to, he has no intention to do so,” White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters flying with Trump back to Washington from a day trip to Wisconsin. The comment is intended to tamp down speculation about whether the president would ax Mueller, which would be a politically explosive move that could further embroil his administration in controversy.
1. It was started by Trump's own buddy, that Newsmax guy. 2. As Rosenstein confirmed yesterday, Sanders (and therefore almost certainly Trump) is wrong about Trump having the "right to" fire Mueller. 3. You seriously believe the White House after all this?
I believe them over you. What if monkeys fly out of your butt? That's the kind of question you ask. Completely unlikely, but I suppose you think possible.
