oh nvm its just rip city tonight. where you get to hear jay allen and kenny vance talk about the same shit they talked about for 3 hours earlier today......
Much ado about nothing. Obviously Penn pissed someone off big time - otherwise he would not have been let go in such a manner. Iit was a rash move by a usually steady front office, so its emotional, its anger. All of the conspiracies are just so much hogwash. Just look at the facts and make a deduction. It's easy. Someone upstairs got mucho angry.
You could be right, but it doesn't have to be anger. It could be that he did something that just demanded being fired. barfo
I talked to one of my sources and he gave me the real scoop: [video=youtube;-RvNS7JfcMM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RvNS7JfcMM[/video]
Brian Smith has some insight on what happened. http://www.columbian.com/weblogs/bl...-miller-says-penns-firing-was-isolated-incid/ http://www.columbian.com/weblogs/bl...iew-blazers-president-miller-on-pritchard-pe/ Hamzano is an idiot.
The Blazers are a private business, and have the right to conduct their business in private. They have no legal obligation to tell the press, or us, anything. OTOH, they should consider whether it would be better for the team to just come out and tell what happened and put an end to the speculation.
Yes, good point. People can get fired on the spot for all sorts of reasons -- insubordination, dishonesty, a blown deal, inappropriate actions, and more, and less, you name it. That's the point - and the Brian Smith article seems to bear this out - it was some isolated incident, not a feud.
I'm hearing that Penn was fired for bring a hand gun on to Blazer property. I guess it was completely unintentional but it was the 2nd time he's made that mistake. After the first time he was told if he did it again it he would be immediately terminated.
Umm...what? If that's a joke, it went right over my head. I hate to be a guppy, but did you really hear that, from someone legit?
I'd also like to know if this is serious and what source..... After reading today's interview with Larry Miller, sounds like it had to be something like that. He says it was not about Minnesota, not about Clippers, not a human resource issue (although wouldn't carrying a gun to work be human resource?) and not a personal confrontation with someone in the organization. That doesn't leave many explanations for letting someone go who they will apparently have to pay for the next two years. Sleeping with someone's wife in the organization; seems like that would have led to a personal confrontation, so that doesn't seem to fit. Maybe Dwight James is right, we will just never know.
Not a joke but it is a rumor that I heard from a fairly reliable source. I have no idea if it's true. I was hoping that by posting it someone else would chime in and say that they heard it also. After reading all of the speculation by "the experts" I do believe that it is most likely that this or something very similar to it is the reason behind Penn being fired. It's not a warning shot to KP but most likely Penn just shooting himself in the foot.
Ah, so he brought the gun to work to fire a warning shot at KP, but instead shot himself in the foot ... makes sense now
