Trade Ideas 2024 Offseason

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by blazerkor, Apr 16, 2024.

?

How many players on our current roster will we trade this offseason?

  1. 1

    10.3%
  2. 2

    30.8%
  3. 3

    38.5%
  4. 4

    10.3%
  5. 5 or more

    10.3%
  1. Whyachi

    Whyachi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2023
    Messages:
    6,616
    Likes Received:
    3,618
    Trophy Points:
    113
    not only does every Blazer get A's and B's for end of season grades... Portland can easily trade #7 & #14 picks to move up and draft Sarr at #1, while also dumping Thybulle's beefy contract on Atlanta to avoid Cronin's self induced tax dillemma.

    welcome to Blazers Edge, your 1 stop fantasy store for clickbait conversations
     
    Last edited: May 18, 2024
    SwissBlazer and UKRAINEFAN like this.
  2. sheed30

    sheed30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    517
    Trophy Points:
    93
    The Orlando trade is horrible. Ant alone for WCJ is a rip off, 2025 FRP wont be a high pick if Orlando makes the playoffs again. What do you guys see in WCJ? Super injury prone too, he is nothing special. Odd take from you guys, and if you want to pair Carter and Ayton, even more hilarious.
     
  3. beast crnjo

    beast crnjo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2018
    Messages:
    3,695
    Likes Received:
    2,734
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We got more for Damian than we did for the loss of Drexler,Wallace,Roy, and Aldridge combined. Which is to say, at least we got something instead nothing.

    We all know that sucking for a bit is better for the future than having Dame carry us to first round exits.
     
    JFizzleRaider likes this.
  4. beast crnjo

    beast crnjo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2018
    Messages:
    3,695
    Likes Received:
    2,734
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think you under-estimate WCJ. He's a plus defender. Good rebounder, very efficient scorer, both inside and from 3. He brings roughly the same value to the PF/C position as Simons does as a guard. So it would be a roster balancing move for both teams. Especially if the Blazers end up drafting another guard.

    And why can't Carter and Ayton play together like Towns and Gobert?
     
    cheesehoff likes this.
  5. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    32,421
    Likes Received:
    40,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trying to picture what the general attitude in this forum would be if that vision were to actually materialize and we entered Summer League with a roster including:
    • PG: Scoot/Black/Banton
    • SG: Sharpe/Thybulle/Ivey/Fournier
    • SF: Camara/Cody Williams/Rupert
    • PF: Risacher/Walker/Murray
    • C: Ayton/WCJ/Ware/Reath
    I'd have a tough time not being excited about the future of that roster, even if I wouldn't expect many wins over the next couple seasons.
     
    HoopsFanAZ and Natebishop3 like this.
  6. sheed30

    sheed30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    517
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I think you overate WCJ, and by a big margin.

    First off, he isn’t a good rebounder, he is an average one. Last season his rebounds dipped and he only averaged 6.9 reb per game as a center.

    He isn’t very efficient from 3, as you stated. He is a career 33.4% from 3.

    He is super super injury prone. He averages 45 game played per season in 8 season lol. That’s horrible. And once again was injured with many different injuries last season.

    The reason him and Ayton are way different that Gobert and Towns is because Towns is a great 3% shooter and can spread the floor. Towns is a career 39.7% from 3.

    Way different and once again you guys are overrating WCJ greatly and I’m glad none of you are GM’s lol
     
    AmirIcon likes this.
  7. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    32,421
    Likes Received:
    40,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    His minutes were also reduced. His per/36 did decrease, but it was still a very solid 9.8. Career rebounds per/36 is 11.1. He's just fine as a rebounder.

    Over the past 3 years, he's at 35% from 3. Not KAT-level, sure, but certainly respectable.

    Certainly a concern... but less of an issue than with RW3, who would also be sent over in the trade proposal to which you responded.

    I look at this as
    • Ant for Black/2025 FRP
    • RW3 for WCJ
    IMO, the benefit to us in upgrading from RW3 to WCJ is greater than the detriment of sending Ant out for a prospect and a pick, so overall it's a good deal for us.
     
  8. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    21,333
    Likes Received:
    33,270
    Trophy Points:
    113
    who are you talking about?

    WCJ has played 6 seasons, not 8; and he has averaged 55 games (adjusted for Covid), not 45. That's still not good, granted, and would be a major concern with adding him

    I think you are underrating him as a rebounder. He posted a high of an 18.5% rebound rate in 2021-22; that ranked 13th in the NBA. His career average is 17% which would have ranked him 20th this season. He did dip to 15.9% this season. But that was still a better rate than Sengun, Holmgren KAT, Myles Turner, Naz Reid, Zach Collins, Markkanen, and Porzingis. And he happens to play on one of the best rebounding teams in the league. Orlando ranked 2nd in defensive rebounding rate and 7th in offensive rebounding rate; meaning his teammates are grabbing rebounds that he might normally secure

    as far as his three-point shooting, I really don't think that's too important. Ayton never shoots them and no Ayton fan here says that's a negative. WCJ has improved quite a bit from three in any event: in the last 2 seasons he has converted 144 three's out of 396 attempts. That's a 36.4% conversion rate on 3.5 shots a game. That's right around the NBA average and that high a rate from a big changes a defense

    but three's aren't the only shot in the NBA. Over the last three seasons, WCJ's TS% has been .601-->.621-->.623 while his FT rate has hovered around 31.5%. Those are very efficient numbers. Ayton's TS mark this season was .587 and he had the best mark in Portland's rotation

    and of course, what was being discussed was a Simons + Timelord for WCJ + Black + 2025 first; not a straight Simons for WCJ trade. I think that's pretty unrealistic because Ant just doesn't have that kind of value, IMO. But I'd really like for Portland to find a trade partner for Ant because the Blazers+Simons has become just like the Blazers+CJ. There's no good reason to spend the salary and give him the usage that Portland does.

    edit: the platypus beat me to it
     
  9. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    32,421
    Likes Received:
    40,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only because you went into far more detail than I did.
     
    BIG Q likes this.
  10. Tince

    Tince Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    14,998
    Likes Received:
    14,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's a thing.

    Michael Lewis wrote about it in The Undoing Project I think. Our mind jumps to the most simple comparisons first and goes from there.
     
  11. AmirIcon

    AmirIcon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,866
    Likes Received:
    5,285
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Writer, Director, Actor
    I'd be far more interested in developing Ware than playing WCJ, which I guess we'd be able to for nearly half the season due to his constant injuries.
     
  12. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    21,333
    Likes Received:
    33,270
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd be far more interested in developing Ware, taking a chance with WCJ, and finding Ayton another zipcode
     
    cheesehoff likes this.
  13. AmirIcon

    AmirIcon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,866
    Likes Received:
    5,285
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Writer, Director, Actor
    If I'm moving Ant, I'm getting back Black and a 1st at a minimum. WCJ is pretty irrelevant. I'd keep Ayton for at least another year to let Ware have a skilled mentor. Probably won't be able to move Ayton for another year anyways.
     
    BankTeller and blazerkor like this.
  14. BankTeller

    BankTeller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2021
    Messages:
    2,592
    Likes Received:
    2,431
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Agreed. If Black + next year’s DEN 1st is the best we can get, I’m not sure I’d be fine with it, but whatever. I’m totally not on board with WCJ or Isaac as the main piece coming back. Going from DA to WCJ isn’t franchise-altering, a raw 6’7 PG with some promise could, even if unlikely.

    DA + rookie + Reath is no worse than rookie + WCJ + Reath.
     
  15. BigGameDamian

    BigGameDamian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    30,155
    Likes Received:
    11,626
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Does Keldon Johnson blow your skirt up if San Antonio is interested in Ant Simons?
     
  16. Blazinaway

    Blazinaway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,554
    Likes Received:
    3,880
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wait, you think Ant is worth last years 6 pick and another 1st? I think you are dreaming, no way is Ant worth that
     
  17. Samuel

    Samuel James “Hollywood” Robinson

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,732
    Likes Received:
    1,646
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not at all, Keldon is the same issue as Ant but at a different position (will never be a starter on a good team but paid like one)
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2024
    BigGameDamian likes this.
  18. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    21,434
    Likes Received:
    13,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't see any value in Anthony Black or Denver's late pick, so is it really that far-fetched?
     
    AmirIcon likes this.
  19. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    21,434
    Likes Received:
    13,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If he was a little longer maybe. I believe he is only 6'4.75" with a 6'9" wing span. He does weigh in at 220 though.
    But we need a forward if we trade Ant IMO
     
  20. HoopsFanAZ

    HoopsFanAZ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2022
    Messages:
    668
    Likes Received:
    769
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Arizona
    Kelton Johnson is a real player as a shorter SF, but that’s why I’m with Black at 6’5.75” / 6’7.5” wingspan / 210 as a PG and possible point-forward.

    3 guard rotation that might just together at the same time. Orlando’s timeline is ahead of the Blazers, so getting 20+ points now with Simon’s makes sense.

    The question of trading for Giddey coming up with chatter about the Spurs willing to trade 8 for him is interesting, but Giddey is a PG only which the Spurs need. Black’s D helps out the Blazers. Teams hunting for Black on D should be much less an issue.
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2024
    UKRAINEFAN likes this.

Share This Page