Trading for a SF

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Tince, Sep 15, 2009.

?

Where do you stand on trading for a SF

  1. Thought we should have traded for one at the deadline, and wish we had.

    31.0%
  2. Thought we should have traded for one at the deadline, but now I'm glad we didn't.

    11.9%
  3. Didn't think we needed to make a trade at the deadline, now I wish we had.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Didn't think we needed to make a trade at the deadline, and still glad we didn't.

    57.1%
  1. MrSelfDestruct

    MrSelfDestruct Louie, Louie, Louie

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2009
    Messages:
    945
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    Buying
    Location:
    Sammamish, WA
    I haven't ever really been as concerned as others about the SF spot. I think he may be a few years away as a complete player, but Nic is our future at SF.

    I've always been more concerned about PG, which obviously, we addressed this offseason. I'm curious what was available in the realm of PGs around the deadline.
     
  2. RoyIsClutch07

    RoyIsClutch07 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Sounds as if A. Miller was targeted and close to being a blazer.
     
  3. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    28,935
    Likes Received:
    9,593
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    Bingo!

    Not trading Raef's contract stings. I like Miller but Raef's insured/expiring contract was a gold mine.

    Consolidating is something KP must do. I'd be down for a Battier for Outlaw/Webster deal, or something along those lines.
     
  4. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,402
    Likes Received:
    6,323
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Tough question.

    I wanted to add a vet at the deadline, and I still think we would have done better in the play-offs if we had done so. The obvious catch, is that I (like most everybody else) wanted the "right" player. Since we may have wound up with the "right" player anyway, and I firmly believe Batum has a bright future, I'm not crying in my beer over it.

    I guess my answer to the poll is "none of the above". If we had a chance at a high caliber PG, particularly one younger than Miller, then I am very PO'ed. If it was a SF, I only really care if it was somebody like Butler or Wallace.
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2009
  5. anonymous gambler

    anonymous gambler Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I really wanted Wallace or Butler...heck I would have settled for Jefferson! But if it's an either or proposition between the above and Andre Miller...I'd think twice but would still want Wallace or Butler. There are only so many opportunities to add young studs like them.
     
  6. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    No. The goal is a championship, isn't it? Nobody remembers who tied for third, or even who took second.
     
  7. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,461
    Likes Received:
    20,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    Did Pippen have the ball handling and distributing talents to be a Pippen when he was Nico's age?
     
  8. Tince

    Tince Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    15,259
    Likes Received:
    14,715
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is spot on.
     
  9. Nikolokolus

    Nikolokolus There's always next year

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    30,704
    Likes Received:
    6,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Amen.

    I seem to recall that Gerald Wallace was available (though supposedly Nic was the sticking point from Charlotte's end) and I certainly thought Jefferson might be a reasonable use of RLEC with a consolidation trade (Blake and Outlaw or somesuch) to acquire a guy like Miller would have seemed like a decent use of assets.

    A lot of people still don't want to hear it, but this team still desperately needs some kind of consolidation trade, otherwise we're probably going to see Travis wasted as an asset this year -- he's either going to see a dip in his statistical output which will depress his trade value or he's likely to demand more money than the team would be willing to pay when his contract expires next July and he's going to walk for nothing.
     
  10. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,402
    Likes Received:
    24,364
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I doubt the people here care since it seems they absolutely despise him. (Not that they are right)
     

Share This Page