What would make you believe I watch Fox News? See the issue is you are already on the defense putting me in the right wing box. I’m not. I don’t watch fox, I don’t watch cnn. The evidence shown isn’t good evidence. This hasn’t been a narrative pushed by left wing news outlets but there is simply no truth to it.
Come on they are basically the same thing. By saying they interfered with the election means there would be a collusion. You can’t have one without the other and I don’t understand what calling me little buddy does to satisfy you but I mean okay sure.
They are not at all the same. Collusion means that Trump or somebody worked with the Russians to sway the election. That is still being investigated. But it is very well established that the Russians interfered.
I still don’t understand why everybody thinks Russia would purposely want trump to win. Hillary had a uranium deal done with them before, it’s not like she was anti Russia. That’s where the whole theory loses me. It makes no sense for them to want trump to win
It does sound like they interfered to me. Not necessarily to get Trump elected, but to undermine our democracy. The same thing that we have done in the elections of multiple other countries.
I don't even think there is a country called Russia. I've never been there, I can't see it from my house, sounds like one more conspiracy made up by the liberal media.
The American intelligence agencies said it was mainly interference to sow dischord in the elective process at first, and then they selected Trump later. Also the Uranium One thing is BS. Stop listening to right wing propaganda. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/ It’s not a theory at this point.
So you give me snopes, A well known left wing fact checker. Man. It’s not propaganda. That was a deal that did occur and though she wasn’t the only one involved signing off on it, she was a part of it. The American intelligence agencies have never been truthful in American history. Why believe them now through all the lame shit they have historically done? I mean if there is a narrative they as gonna help push it. I don’t see the connection. Wikileaks dropped the bomb on everybody through a leaker who worked for the dnc, hinted to be Seth rich by Julian assange, go figure he got murdered in a mysterious way. That was the big dnc leaks which kind of made people realize the person they were dealing with in Hillary Clinton and the podesta emails, etc. full on revealed the party screwed over Bernie Sanders and he ended up selling out for Hillary after that. Revealed all the strategies of Hillary. They actually wanted to go up against somebody like trump, they thought it would be easy. It all backfired and trump got elected. I don’t see where the Russians interfered here.
A conversation ends if logic fails. You choose to believe a story by Breitbart (the most sensationalistic Right-wing rag) and yet dismiss snoops as being left. If facts don’t matter I’m not going to waste my time.
Because snopes is left. Where have I quoted or referenced Breitbart? I was referencing wikileaks which by the way hasn't been proven wrong. Ever. So explain to me in what I typed to you what is straight from Breitbart because if I had to guess it would be that I dropped a little too much information on you that maybe you couldn't handle. This is the typical left wing shutdown of conversation. "you probably think the earth is flat little buddy" "You choose to believe a story by breitbart". Where is this coming from? it's just an easy way for you to shutdown conversation and not have to continue anymore.
I never even cited Breitbart. I never even said it was all Hillary. I just said she was part of that deal, a large group of people were. I am guessing anything bad Hillary has been apart of is all from Breitbart and is a lie. I laid it all out for you after that about wikileaks. Your response was good luck because you had nothing to respond with
You cited a story that was originated by Breitbart. A bullshit story. Yet you casually toss aside snopes while taking right wing horseshit as gospel. That’s fine, but it shuts down conversation. It means facts don’t matter. So I’m not going to spend my time arguing where facts don’t matter.
Breitbart claimed it was all Hillary who signed off on this deal all by herself when in reality it was her and a group of people. She denies it but lets be real. So because of this one thing, you think I believe facts don't matter where here I am straightening it. I believe she signed off on it along with the others, if she didn't it still doesn't derail the conversation because that's not even what it was about. I just had told you everything about wikileaks yet you pick out something I had briefly mentioned prior to that and now you shut it all down. I mean fine, okay if that's what you want to do.
