Tony Podesta Is Sixth Clinton-Linked Democrat to Be Granted Immunity — While Paul Manafort Rots in Prison for Same Crime by Jim Hoft July 19, 2018 298 Comments Paul Combetta, the computer specialist who deleted Hillary Clinton’s emails when they were under subpoena, was granted immunity by the Obama DOJ in September 2016. Cheryl Mills, Hillary Clinton’s former chief of staff and attorney, received an immunity deal from the Justice Department during the year-long FBI investigation of Clinton’s server before she even testified. John Bentel director of the State Department’s Office of Information Resources Management, was given immunity by the Obama DOJ. Heather Samuelson, a senior Hillary Clinton adviser, was also given immunity agreements, bringing the total number of witnesses who were protected by deals to five. Bryan Pagliano, Clinton’s former IT aide who set up her email server, received immunity by the Obama DOJ. The Obama DOJ interviewed 17 top witnesses in the Hillary Clinton server investigation AFTER the decision was made to exonerate her. This week we learn that dirty cop Robert Mueller granted immunity to Tony Podesta who committed the same exact crimes as Paul Manafort. Today Manafort sits in isolation in a prison cell. Tony Podesta will walk free. The Democrat Deep State has turned America into a banana republic. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-paul-manafort-rots-in-prison-for-same-crime/
I bought an electrolytic capacitor about five years ago to fix the power supply in my Samsung TV. Does that count?
The article states only proven and publicly known facts. So far, 6 Clinton accomplices have all been given immunity, mostly without even testifying or being charged with anything. It's disturbing that any American can laugh that off.
Quite obvious you don't follow ANY news source, or you'd already know how silly your post is. How big is that bubble you live in?
Referring Podesta to SDNY is NOT the same as granting him immunity! It's arguably the opposite. So yes, your post about immunity was bullshit, sorry. barfo
Not at all. The article quoted is accurate and has been verified that Meuller OFFERED Podesta immunity. The Gateway Pundit apparently used the word GRANTED when linking the article, which was incorrect since Podesta told him to pound sand. Podesta, like Manafort, seems confident Meuller will lose. The other 5 Dems obviously accepted immunity.
Sorry, Tucker Carlson saying that Podesta was offered immunity is not any sort of verification. barfo
On the contrary (as usual), I follow first and foremost PBS The NewsHour. On the flip side, Fox News has been wrong so many times that I've concluded that only a fool would follow it unless for sport. Wait a minute, Trump follows Fox. Could Trump be a . . . . ?
So I was correct, as PBS is not a news source other than a smidgen of socialist propaganda they toss out for their programmable minions. They are an entertainment/education organization and pretty much ignore daily news events. Readers Digest is a more complete news source than PBS.
He has a far more accurate reporting record than you, and certainly more reliable sources. Plus, there's the obvious record of bias and abuse of office Meuller and the DOJ have established by offering immunity to every Democrat associated in any way with the Clinton Crime Family who they can't protect by other means such as NOT INVESTIGATING THEM AT ALL.
