Wallace waiting to start (feels betrayed)

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by MIXUM, Mar 6, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,303
    Likes Received:
    5,884
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    Usually you're not this obvious. You're slipping, Rudy.
     
  2. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    I guess I don't see the trolling in this thread. While the title could have been more specific, it is accurate.
     
  3. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    19,974
    Likes Received:
    17,185
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    GTFO, the title implies he feels betrayed by the Blazers for not being a starter. when in fact he feels betrayed by his old team of 7 years for trading him. Typical Mixum bait.
     
  4. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,775
    Likes Received:
    27,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's bait, yes, but because you and everyone else interpreted it incorrectly, doesn't make it trolling


    I could call you up and say ewes suck, and not at all be talking about you. It's how it's interpreted
     
  5. Wheels

    Wheels Is That A Challenge?!?!1! Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    16,261
    Likes Received:
    831
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hood River, OR
    lol not trolling but def a purposely misleading title.
     
  6. Wheels

    Wheels Is That A Challenge?!?!1! Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    16,261
    Likes Received:
    831
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hood River, OR
    [​IMG]
     
  7. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    Isn't it the fault of the person interpreting the title? Because the title is accurate, if you read that actual first post.
     
  8. Wheels

    Wheels Is That A Challenge?!?!1! Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    16,261
    Likes Received:
    831
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hood River, OR
    Right now the Wallace story goes "Wallace cant wait to start... but he feels betrayed... Is it the Blazers fault? Check my thread to find out. The Gerald Wallace ongoing trade saga by Mixum.... With Dwight Jaynes"
     
  9. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    There are two victims on this board: 1) PapaG 2) Mixim.
     
  10. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Yeah, because it is possible to read the post before reading the title. Good call!
     
  11. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Same thing, moderator.
     
  12. Wheels

    Wheels Is That A Challenge?!?!1! Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    16,261
    Likes Received:
    831
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hood River, OR
    :cheers:
     
  13. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    The title is just fine. If you don't like the way he titled the thread, I'm sorry.

    I would be interested to see someone try to put a recap of the article into six words in a more accurate fashion.

    Ed O.
     
  14. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    Some might call that good marketing. The title is vague enough to attract enough attention for further clarification. In other words, it made people click on the thread. :)
     
  15. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Sorry. Does that mean you leave your objectivity in your forum? :)
     
  16. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    No. It's not.

    If you like the way it is titled, I'm sorry.
     
  17. Ed O

    Ed O Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    2,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Let's see...

    Is the title going to be changed? No.

    Is it fine? Yes.

    Ed O.
     
  18. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    This is correct. Which is exactly why Denny let's this garbage continue.
     
  19. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    You're the person acting upset over a thread title. If you assumed that the title meant something, well, that was your own fault. You basically outed yourself as being narrow-minded and incapable of understanding nuance. :)
     
  20. blazerboy30

    blazerboy30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Fine as in "misleading in order to get people to click it"? Yes.

    Fine as in "how rational human beings interpret"? No.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page