<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>It's kind of sad that you guys have to take shots at kobe and the lakers simply because J rich silenced you guys.Dirk needs to yell at his teamates, this is the right time. PS: Stackhouse 6th man of the yearMY <Censored> :HAHAHA: edit: They let in 120+ points, his teamates derserve a spanking.My discussion with rokmelo061: kobe doesn't yell at his teamates, he glares then drops 81melo061: dirk yells and chokesmelo061: i win</div>Nah man, it's called you focusing on a one situation that everyone is over with, but you bring up for no reason in this game. So I bring up one for Kobe.Also, nice discussion, you had me in none of that. Afterwards I told you it's not plural if it's only one time and you said who cares. Exactly. <span style="color:#000000"><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>melo061:<span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Arial color#000000 size2 FAMILY">dirk yells and chokes</span><span style="font-family:Arial color#0000ff size1 FAMILY">melo061: i</span><span style="color:#000000"><span style="font-family:Arial color#000000 size2 FAMILY"> win</span><span style="font-family:Arial color#ff0000 size1 FAMILY">ROKUSA27: </span><span style="color:#000000">u mean yell </span><span style="font-family:Arial color#ff0000 size1 FAMILY">ROKUSA27: </span></span><span style="color:#000000">its not plural if its one time </span><span style="font-family:Arial color#0000ff size1 FAMILY">melo061: </span>who cares</span></div></span>Also, you think a buzzer beater isn't a game winner, when in fact a buzzer beater is a game winner. OMG we let up 120 pts. Big deal.To use your words, it's kind of sad your trying to start stuff with crap.
I do believe a buzzer beater is a gamewinner, however a gamewinner is not always a buzzer beaters. Therefore there not the same, they don't work both ways.EG:Was Tmac's 3 pointer against the spurs last season in his 13-35 game a buzzer beater? No, he didn't hit the shot at the buzzer. Spurs still had a little time. Was kobe's shot against the cavs this year a buzzer beaters? It was a gamewinner but not buzzer beater.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>I do believe a buzzer beater is a gamewinner, however a gamewinner is not always a buzzer beaters. Therefore there not the same, they don't work both ways.</div> :HAHAHA: You just said a buzzer beater is a gamewinner, but then say their not the same and don't work both ways. First I agree a game winner doesn't have to be a buzzer beater, but a buzzer beater is a game winner. It wins the game. So that's two ways to approach it, but you say it doesn't work both ways. Second, you don't have to list examples, to me a buzzer beater is a game winner, simple. I don't look at it in different perspectives like you do by putting stuff into unneeded categories, e.g. your clutch system.
A buzzer beater is a gamewinner because it wins the game [by definition]. However is Kobe's shot against the cavs a buzzer beater? I don't think so. It's a gamewinner, he did not shoot it at the buzzer.This is all by definition.
At least Kobe is getting a scoring title. Too bad stats is the only thing he can have these days. The mavs choked in this game but I've seen many times this year where they were clutch but these kind of things happen to all teams once or twice a season. It even happened to the spurs last year against the rockets.
Your not comprehending, I said a buzzer beater is a game winner. Your switching the words around like I'm saying a game winner is only a buzzer beater. Like I said there's two ways to approach it, and you clearly said you can't both ways.
Kobe's already done the championship part, the stats are coming. Once he retires people 20 years later people will see a good stats player, 3 championships and 81.In 20 years people will remember about dirk as the greatest european ever and as a guy who screamed at his teamates then preceeded to choke.This is getting good :nasty:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Kobe's already done the championship part, the stats are coming. Once he retires people 20 years later people will see a good stats player, 3 championships and 81.In 20 years people will remember about dirk as the greatest european ever and as a guy who screamed at his teamates then preceeded to choke.This is getting good :nasty:</div>Your the same person who said in 20 years, people won't remember John Stockton. So yea, your visualizations on the future should be taken as seriously as Peter Vescey's trade rumors.And seriously get over the Dirk/yelling issue. For a Laker who doesn't like hearing the rape issue with Kobe, your hung up over a stupid yell in one game. I mean, speechless.
I never said john stockton would not be remembered, stop with the <Censored> garbage. I said that he'd probably be remembered vaguely, not like Michael jordan and othets.And one cheapshot only deserves another. It's all a joke, do you see anyone being serious here?
The only joke here is the lakers. I hope they get in the playoffs this year so they can get swept in first round. lol
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>I never said john stockton would not be remembered, stop with the <Censored> garbage. I said that he'd probably be remembered vaguely, not like Michael jordan and othets.And one cheapshot only deserves another. It's all a joke, do you see anyone being serious here?</div> It was serious till you posted. No one was even joking but you. And who brung the first cheapshot? lol. And yes you said Stockton would be vaguely remembered which basically means not much. And that is garbage.
I guess the main thing is don't take Clutch Melo's comments seriously since he likes to joke around by taunting mavs fans and talking shit about Dirk.
Nah i was so amazed at the shot, best buzzer beater this season. I don't think calling someone the mavs killer is a cheapshot. anyways Go J rich. Great game today.edit: I guess the main thing is don't take Clutch Melo's comments seriously since he likes to joke around by taunting mavs fans and talking <Censored> about Dirk.Hey, i did not blame dirk for today's loss. If i did, you could call me a flat out hater. Dirk is the best PF in the league [this season].
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Nah i was so amazed at the shot, best buzzer beater this season. I don't think calling someone the mavs killer is a cheapshot.</div>No but bringing up Dirk yelling at his teammates is. But yea I think this thread is done.
It is, dirk yelling at his teamates is a cheapshot. But if dirk now yelled at his teamates [after this game] especially stackhouse i wouldn't mind. Stackhouse derserves it. He scores 51 and somehow dallas lost. I'd pull a fit if that happened.
It was his own fault for the loss. So if anything he should yell at himself. And they just didn't have an answer for Jason Richardson. Mike Dunleavy played well as well. On these nights, nothing you can do.
He was not the reason why they lost. You don't drop 51 and be the reason why they lost. He was incredible in the 4th and made a stupid play that caused a 3 point play. That doesn't take the fact away that the team defense sucked, giving up 30 in the 4th. That doesn't take away from the fact that Stackhouse went for 0-6.Nowitzki is not the reason why they lost.
He was the reason that they lost, yeah. he turned the ball over off a rebound. If he grabbed that one and held on, the Mavs would have had the game. How would you know? You didn't even watch it.
