Warriors @ Minnesota

Discussion in 'Golden State Warriors' started by Rudeezy, Feb 27, 2004.

  1. Custodianrules2

    Custodianrules2 Cohan + Rowell = Suck

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    11,741
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    All in all an awful game in the 2nd half. Dunleavy couldn't even get a number up on the board with his 3 shot attempts. And no, zero doesn't count! But he sure looked good passing. Maybe he'll be the starting point.

    Cliff Robinson was horrendous. Way too perimeter and risky with those flat shots. But Damp had 10/14 shooting and 19 rebounds. Way awesome. 2 points and a rebound shy of 20/20.
     
  2. Warriorfansnc93

    Warriorfansnc93 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,993
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting Rudeezy:</div><div class="quote_post">We are still a better team without Speedy, just depends which Warrior's team shows up.</div>

    Better team withOUT speedy? Why dont you take a look at the records when speedy starts and NVE starts. I think Speedy is close to .500
     
  3. Purple N Gold

    Purple N Gold JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,585
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting Rudeezy:</div><div class="quote_post">We are still a better team without Speedy, just depends which Warrior's team shows up.</div>

    I disagree. Speedy Claxton has a much better attitude than Van Exel and shows more consistency on defense, and also has his fair share of games where he will give a good offensive effort. Van Exel was a success earlier in the year, but it just all fell apart. However, like you said, it does mostly depend of which Warrior team shows up. Consistency is the main problem of course, Warriors just don't get the production they need out of their players every game. If Golden State had been healthy all year, we may be talking about playoffs now though, who knows.
     
  4. Gohn

    Gohn JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    893
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting Rudeezy:</div><div class="quote_post">We are still a better team without Speedy, just depends which Warrior's team shows up.</div>

    I think when Rudeezy posted this he meant that the Warriors are still better than the bulls without claxton.
     
  5. Rudeezy

    Rudeezy JBB Senior *********

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Messages:
    6,037
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class="quote_poster">Quoting Gohn:</div><div class="quote_post">I think when Rudeezy posted this he meant that the Warriors are still better than the bulls without claxton.</div>LOL...I'm glad someone understood what I meant. Do you guys really believe that I think the Warriors are a better team without Speedy? Hence, the avater.[​IMG]
     
  6. Warriorfansnc93

    Warriorfansnc93 JBB JustBBall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,993
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Whew, I thought you were going in the deep end there Rudeezy. Thanks for clearing that up.I agree that we are better than the bulls at this point. In fact, when we played them last time wasn't NVE still the starting pg?
     

Share This Page