That wasn't my point and that's not what you did. Read @barfo 's response. My point is that you keep talking about the refs in the 2000 WCF and no one cares anymore. Nobody but you thinks Hillary is a relevant talking point. It's boring. But whatever. Was just trying to given you a friendly S2 posting tip.
My point is that Clinton is entirely relevant because she and her organization are the entire source of the Russia nonsense. She wrote a fucking book and went on tour. Grandma in NY state, my ass. My point about sycophants is proven, thank you.
She paid those people for years. Take a look at who was paid by the Clinton "charities." I see your head in the sand, as usual.
Nope. The source of the "Russia nonsense" is Campaign chairman Manafort - Russian operative Rick Gates, deputy campaign mamager - Russian ties Natl Security Advisor Flynn - Russian Operative. Natl security advisor!!! And lying to the FBI about it. George Papadopoulos - Lied also to the FBI about his extensive contacts with Russia Roger Stone - The Trump contact with Julian Assange, Russian puppet and Wikileaks founder. Ain't no Hillary in sight. But I am done arguing Hillary with you because it's a thankless circular firing squad. Tried to give you a heads up about that beating the dead horse take of yours but no good deed goes unpunished with you.
Nope, the source of the Russia nonsense is the Clinton campaign. Her campaign colluded with Russian spies. Of that there is concrete proof. Of your claims (being "operatives"), not so much. Repeat them as you will, but they're just not true. If Russian "ties" are all that you care about: By your "logic" - she must be an operative!
She was an operative - of the US government. All those Trumpers were operatives, but of something that was not the US government. barfo
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/09/us/politics/us-cyberweapons-russia-trump.html U.S. Spies, Seeking to Retrieve Cyberweapons, Paid Russian Peddling Trump Secrets (Actual collusion, to hurt the Trump campaign)
More collusion. Sorry you don't like it, @Stevenson, but like I said, this Russia thing is all a manufacturing of the Clinton campaign. You cannot remove her from the discussion. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/9/john-kerry-associate-played-middleman-hillary-agen/ John Kerry associate played middleman for Hillary agents’ smut and dossier’s Christopher Steele A former State Department official has confirmed that he played middleman in relaying anti-Trump smut from two Hillary Clinton operatives to dossier writer Christopher Steele who passed it to the FBI. It is a further thickening of the plot by Democratic Party agents to get unverified dossier material into the news media and the Obama Justice Department before election day Nov. 8. Jonathan M. Winer, who was former secretary state John Kerry’s special envoy to Libya and his Senate adviser, disclosed the the behind-the-scenes get-Trump operation in a Washington Post op-ed. Mr. Winer confirmed a redacted Senate report released on Tuesday that said information on candidate Trump flowed between Mr. Steele and Clinton operatives, with Mr. Winer as the middleman.
In this thread? That looks like a link, the headline of the article, and the fake news spin about the article. Again, did you read the entire article? It's a simple yes or no.
