Rumor What's going on in Portland?

i have to apologize to you. It wasn't you. It was riverman. You pushed back but didnt like the post. Riverman pushed back but did. I just went and checked.
However i have a question for you, i rarely have anything to say to you but anytime i feel I'm defending myself against a few people here you always then chime in and have something to say. Why only then?

 

If you detest the community here so much, @Orion Bailey, why do you post here so regularly? I'm not saying you can't, I'm just asking why you do. If I hated a group of people as much as you seem to hate the people here, I certainly wouldn't constantly socialize with them online.

I get there are a few people here you like and have met in the real world, but have you noticed that the vast majority of your posts in this forum are angry, frustrated, disgusted or derisive? What's the appeal for you? Is this where you get your aggression and anger at the world out?

 

What was the personal insult? May i ask?

just stop dude, seriously. What are you trying to accomplish?

 

we have had this conversation already..
Its not that i hate the community, its because the community hates me because i dont get among with their mascot.

 

I don't think you've ever actually answered that question. I do find it perplexing.

 

wait. The word ignorant is an insult? The words means unknowing. So if i would have said he doesnt know or is aware of his behavior that is okay but using a word that means the same is not okay?

or is it an insult because i said it and you are taking sides here?

 

oh i have, you just. Hose not to accept it.
Indeed quote perplexing...

 

Okay, if you say you have, I believe you. I guess then carry on your crusade of rage in this forum.

 

It seems like rage because its me responding to a gang of people. If so many people didnt pile up it would have been a couple comments and over.
Another thing people are ignorant o... sorry, unaware of around here....

 

but if i say someone is unaware it is not an insult? And if not, whats the difference may i ask?

 

I chimed in earlier today in regards to many of the posters on the board that post about Portland. You took offense and ran with it.
I've tried to engage many times with you and you tend to cut bait and run with an I'll have to look into that, and then it's on to the same shit later with no regards. It's an argumentative style mags always used to have as well. A conversation about A gets stretched into B, with a little of C, and then all of a sudden, it's never been about A. And the discussion can't be had without quips about ways you were wronged, and the bias of others.

You take this place way to personally, IMO. I've never met a single person in here. There's some whose posting styles I like, some I don't. I like posts for varying reasons, not because I'm in a clique with my gardener and a typing dog. I engage in a conversation I want to engage in, not just with specific posters.

 

so aRe you going to answer the question or apologize that you are unaware ignorant just means unaware?

 

honestly, i do not recall you every engaging with me without it being in the middle of a dispute with someone else, basically piling on. So i have never really taken you as impartial and have always had a vibe of bias from you from your first interaction.
You never interacted with me on your own, only in the midst of tension of which, to me, felt like you just piling on without being impartial.

im not saying you should or should have, just explaining why ive not been concerned with going back to point A with you.
if im wrong on that then that's on me, but thats how it has felt from the get go.