Instead of quoting only the parts mentioned on Reddit's The_Donald you should read that entire piece. Especially the most important part when it says, " interested in having a reasoned conversation about it." That's your problem, as smart as you are you've become so insecure that there is no reason and no interest in having a conversation about anything. You use bad science and quotes to try and prove overly simplistic points not to learn or discuss but to win.
im a fan of solar power, not because i think humans are causing global warming, but because ultimately it is needed for space exploration. Making it better and more affordable is just step 1 until star trek.
http://www.climatecentral.org/news/sinking-atlantic-coastline-meets-rapidly-rising-seas-20247 https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sinking-atlantic-coastline-meets-rapidly-rising-seas/ https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/GRD/GPS/Projects/CB/SEALEVEL/sealevel.html http://www.salon.com/2014/01/13/its_not_just_sea_level_rise_the_east_coast_is_sinking_too/
Scientists aren't science they're people. Science is H2O = water, you cannot deny that. Scientists are "we invented the atom bomb and now we have all sorts of feelings of guilt." I've always said humans can pollute and effect the climate. CFCs are an example I've used probably a dozen times here. You repeatedly put words in my mouth and attribute things I don't say to me. Things like "the only harm we can do is CFC." Where did I say "the only harm" ? Seriously, I meant if you have a problem with CO2, stop breathing. You are polluting (LOL) and it's not poison because it's in your body, you produce it, as does every living animal. I think the one that doesn't understand science and biology is you. You are a sucker to believe the people claiming science or some special knowledge they can only possess. I look to the facts, the H20 = water rules.
I don't read reddit except for two subreddits: /r/lupus and /r/keto. And not very often. When faced with even the left most leaning NYT article, your approach is to ignore what it says and make personal attacks on me. I respond in kind, fool. As I've written before, the scientists are people with agendas. The climate writer for the NYT for decades admits it. You = head in sand. As Andrew Revkin wrote last year about his storied career as an environmental reporter at The Times, “I saw a widening gap between what scientists had been learning about global warming and what advocates were claiming as they pushed ever harder to pass climate legislation.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Revkin
