<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Riot_Starter:</div><div class="quote_post">Anyone can post a link that answers a question. But as a moderator wave should have realized that doing so defeats the purpose of the forum. People don't come here for answers to their questions, they come here for the debate aspect.</div>Please don't tell me how to do my job. The first post asked for a definite answer on the subject, not opinions. If the post was worded like, "Who do you think should start?" then it'd be different.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting pennyhardaway:</div><div class="quote_post">Who starts, Penny or Joe Johnson. I would like an honest answer and a good reason why.</div> Wave you're a genius. Above is what the post asked for. If it was simply a fact-based question, he wouldn't have asked for; "a good reason why". Also, I'll tell you how to do your job whenever I damn-well please
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Riot_Starter:</div><div class="quote_post">Wave you're a genius. Above is what the post asked for. If it was simply a fact-based question, he wouldn't have asked for; "a good reason why". </div>I recently edited that in there... pal.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Wave:</div><div class="quote_post">I recently edited that in there... pal.</div> Is that why you listed your reason for editing it as "spelling"? That's logical. But here's a good question; If you edited it so that the post would be opinion-based, why did you later respond with a fact-based link as a response? If you were going to do that, you shouldn't have edited his post in the first place.....pal.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Riot_Starter:</div><div class="quote_post">Is that why you listed your reason for editing it as "spelling"? That's logical. But here's a good question; If you edited it so that the post would be opinion-based, why did you later respond with a fact-based link as a response? If you were going to do that, you shouldn't have edited his post in the first place.....pal.</div>The thread was edited two times. The second was for spelling. It is indeed logical. I did not later respond with the link. I responded with the link and then after discussion about why one player should start over another I went back and edited the post. Again, don't tell me what I can and can't do... pal.
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Wave:</div><div class="quote_post">The thread was edited two times. The second was for spelling. It is indeed logical. I did not later respond with the link. I responded with the link and then after discussion about why one player should start over another I went back and edited the post. Again, don't tell me what I can and can't do... pal.</div> I guess when you're a moderator, you can always edit posts (or lie about doing so) to cover your tracks. Once again, I'll say whatever the hell I want...pal .
